Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Statistical Hypothesis Testing01:16

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

7.0K
Hypothesis testing is a critical statistical procedure facilitating informed, evidence-based decisions. It begins with a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, or a prediction about a population parameter. This hypothesis can be either a null hypothesis (H0), indicating no effect or difference, or an alternative hypothesis (Ha), suggesting an effect or difference.
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
7.0K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

650
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
650
Errors In Hypothesis Tests01:14

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

6.1K
When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
6.1K
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

5.6K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
5.6K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

7.1K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
7.1K
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

560
Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance,...
560

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Humans create more novelty than ChatGPT when asked to retell a story.

Scientific reports·2024
Same author

Serial reproduction of narratives preserves emotional appraisals.

Cognition & emotion·2022
Same author

Bayesian Analysis Reporting Guidelines.

Nature human behaviour·2021
Same author

Lay evaluations of police and civilian use of force: Action severity scales.

Law and human behavior·2019
Same author

Fact vs. Affect in the Telephone Game: All Levels of Surprise Are Retold With High Accuracy, Even Independently of Facts.

Frontiers in psychology·2018
Same author

Editorial: Bayesian methods for advancing psychological science.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2018

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 7, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.3K

The Bayesian New Statistics: Hypothesis testing, estimation, meta-analysis, and power analysis from a Bayesian

John K Kruschke1, Torrin M Liddell2

  • 1Indiana University, Bloomington, USA. johnkruschke@gmail.com.

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|February 9, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Bayesian methods offer a superior approach to data analysis compared to frequentist methods, aligning better with the goals of the New Statistics for estimation and uncertainty quantification. This article explores Bayesian advantages in hypothesis testing and confidence intervals.

Keywords:
Bayes factorBayesian inferenceConfidence intervalCredible intervalEffect sizeEquivalence testingHighest density intervalMeta-analysisNull hypothesis significance testingPower analysisRandomized controlled trialRegion of practical equivalence

More Related Videos

A Novel Bayesian Change-point Algorithm for Genome-wide Analysis of Diverse ChIPseq Data Types
12:39

A Novel Bayesian Change-point Algorithm for Genome-wide Analysis of Diverse ChIPseq Data Types

Published on: December 10, 2012

11.7K
Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI
06:26

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI

Published on: November 27, 2019

78.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 7, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.3K
A Novel Bayesian Change-point Algorithm for Genome-wide Analysis of Diverse ChIPseq Data Types
12:39

A Novel Bayesian Change-point Algorithm for Genome-wide Analysis of Diverse ChIPseq Data Types

Published on: December 10, 2012

11.7K
Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI
06:26

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI

Published on: November 27, 2019

78.4K

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Statistics
  • Data Analysis

Background:

  • A conceptual divide exists in data analysis between hypothesis testing and estimation with quantified uncertainty.
  • The New Statistics movement advocates for a shift from hypothesis testing to estimation in psychology.
  • A further distinction lies between frequentist and Bayesian statistical methodologies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To elucidate how Bayesian methods can more effectively achieve the objectives of the New Statistics than frequentist approaches.
  • To compare frequentist and Bayesian perspectives on hypothesis testing and estimation.

Main Methods:

  • Review of frequentist and Bayesian techniques for hypothesis testing.
  • Examination of frequentist confidence intervals and Bayesian credible intervals for estimation.
  • Description of Bayesian applications in meta-analysis, randomized controlled trials, and power analysis.

Main Results:

  • Bayesian methods provide a more coherent framework for estimation with quantified uncertainty.
  • Bayesian approaches offer advantages in interpreting results and integrating prior information.
  • The article demonstrates the practical utility of Bayesian methods across various statistical applications.

Conclusions:

  • Bayesian methods are better suited to the principles of the New Statistics, emphasizing estimation and uncertainty.
  • The adoption of Bayesian methods can enhance the rigor and interpretability of data analysis in psychology and beyond.
  • Bayesian approaches offer a unified and powerful framework for modern statistical practice.