Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Deep Learning Super-Resolution from Normal to Ultra-High Resolution CT: Conditional Diffusion Model Development and Performance Evaluation in Trabecular Bone Radiomics.

Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering·2026
Same author

Robot-Assisted Reduction of the Ankle Joint via Multi-Body 3D-2D Image Registration.

IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics·2025
Same author

Effects of non-stationary blur on texture biomarkers of bone using Ultra-High Resolution CT.

Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering·2024
Same author

Performance assessment of surgical tracking systems based on statistical process control and longitudinal QA.

Computer assisted surgery (Abingdon, England)·2023
Same author

Multi-Stage Adaptive Spline Autofocus (MASA) with a Learned Metric for Deformable Motion Compensation in Interventional Cone-Beam CT.

Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering·2023
Same author

Surgical navigation for guidewire placement from intraoperative fluoroscopy in orthopaedic surgery.

Physics in medicine and biology·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 7, 2026

A Spine Robotic-Assisted Navigation System for Pedicle Screw Placement
06:24

A Spine Robotic-Assisted Navigation System for Pedicle Screw Placement

Published on: May 11, 2020

9.5K

Spinal pedicle screw planning using deformable atlas registration.

J Goerres1, A Uneri1, T De Silva1

  • 1Johns Hopkins University, Biomedical Engineering, Baltimore, United States of America.

Physics in Medicine and Biology
|February 9, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Automated surgical planning for spinal screw placement uses CT/MRI data to derive pedicle trajectories and device selection, improving accuracy and safety. This method reduces planning time and avoids screw collisions, supporting surgical navigation and quality assurance.

More Related Videos

Pedicle Screw Placement Using an Augmented Reality Head-Mounted Display in a Porcine Model
06:18

Pedicle Screw Placement Using an Augmented Reality Head-Mounted Display in a Porcine Model

Published on: May 24, 2024

2.8K
Optimizing Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: A Fully 3D CT O-Arm Navigated Workflow in MIS TLIF
08:34

Optimizing Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: A Fully 3D CT O-Arm Navigated Workflow in MIS TLIF

Published on: October 17, 2025

749

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 7, 2026

A Spine Robotic-Assisted Navigation System for Pedicle Screw Placement
06:24

A Spine Robotic-Assisted Navigation System for Pedicle Screw Placement

Published on: May 11, 2020

9.5K
Pedicle Screw Placement Using an Augmented Reality Head-Mounted Display in a Porcine Model
06:18

Pedicle Screw Placement Using an Augmented Reality Head-Mounted Display in a Porcine Model

Published on: May 24, 2024

2.8K
Optimizing Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: A Fully 3D CT O-Arm Navigated Workflow in MIS TLIF
08:34

Optimizing Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: A Fully 3D CT O-Arm Navigated Workflow in MIS TLIF

Published on: October 17, 2025

749

Area of Science:

  • Spinal surgery
  • Medical imaging
  • Computational anatomy

Background:

  • Spinal screw placement is complex, with risks of neurological/vascular injury.
  • Current surgical planning relies on time-consuming manual annotations.
  • Precision guidance and quality assurance (QA) are crucial for safe screw placement.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To automate the surgical planning process for spinal screw placement.
  • To derive pedicle trajectory and device selection from preoperative CT/MRI scans.
  • To reduce the manual effort and time required for surgical planning.

Main Methods:

  • Created a 3D atlas of 40 vertebrae surfaces (T7, T8, L3) with 60 pedicle trajectory annotations.
  • Applied sparse deformation fields from the atlas to patient CT/MRI data.
  • Used mean value coordinates for dense interpolation and image-based registration for trajectory optimization.
  • Evaluated the method using a leave-one-out analysis with coherent point drift (CPD) registration.

Main Results:

  • CPD registration achieved surface errors of 0.89 ± 0.10 mm (T7/T8) and 1.29 ± 0.15 mm (L3).
  • Registered trajectories deviated from expert references by 0.56 ± 0.63 mm (T7/T8) and 1.12 ± 0.67 mm (L3) at the pedicle center.
  • Predicted screw diameters showed differences of 0.45 ± 0.62 mm (T7/T8) and 1.26 ± 1.19 mm (L3).
  • The automated method successfully avoided screw collisions in all evaluated cases.

Conclusions:

  • Automated spinal screw planning from CT/MRI is feasible and accurate.
  • The method shows close agreement with expert-defined surgical plans.
  • This approach can potentially enhance surgical guidance and QA systems.