Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Interference and Decay01:16

Interference and Decay

549
Forgetting is a complex cognitive phenomenon influenced by several factors, among which interference and decay are particularly prominent. These processes explain why individuals often struggle to retrieve specific information from memory, leading to lapses in recall that can be observed in everyday situations.
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
549
Retrieval01:12

Retrieval

496
Retrieval is the process of getting information out of memory storage and back into conscious awareness. This ability is essential for daily tasks like brushing hair and teeth, driving to work, and performing job duties. Retrieval occurs in three ways: recall, recognition, and relearning.
Recall involves accessing information without cues, such as during an essay test, where individuals must retrieve facts and concepts from memory unaided. Another example is remembering the name of a colleague...
496
Implicit Memories01:24

Implicit Memories

532
Implicit memories, also known as non-declarative memories, are long-term memories that function outside of conscious awareness. These memories influence behavior and skills without explicit knowledge. This type of memory is evident in tasks like playing tennis, snowboarding, and texting. Implicit memory has three subsystems: procedural memory, conditioning, and priming. This type of memory is essential in various activities, from everyday tasks to specialized skills.
One key aspect of implicit...
532
Statistical Significance01:50

Statistical Significance

23.1K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
23.1K
Framing Effects03:26

Framing Effects

8.0K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
8.0K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

11.0K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
11.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Retrieval practice versus generating mnemonics: Implications for study strategy use in chemistry.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2025
Same author

The present and future of peer review: Ideas, interventions, and evidence.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Alternative models of funding curiosity-driven research.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Is Cognitive Flexibility Equivalent to Shifting? Investigating Cognitive Flexibility in Multiple Domains.

Journal of cognition·2024
Same author

How do students reason about statistical sampling with computer simulations? An integrative review from a grounded cognition perspective.

Cognitive research: principles and implications·2024
Same author

Bias in perceptual learning.

Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science·2024
Same journal

Self-face recognition under self-implicating threat: preserved self-prioritization and recalibrated control dynamics.

Cognitive research: principles and implications·2026
Same journal

Out of sight, out of mind? How discarded items shape environmental judgments.

Cognitive research: principles and implications·2026
Same journal

Implicit learning of social information in contextual cueing.

Cognitive research: principles and implications·2026
Same journal

A downside of conceptual metaphor: metaphoric alignments of black and white.

Cognitive research: principles and implications·2026
Same journal

Visual attention in bilingual instructional videos: effects of audiovisual congruency and subtitle language.

Cognitive research: principles and implications·2026
Same journal

Predicting accuracy in eyewitness showups: confidence and response time in the laboratory, confidence in the field.

Cognitive research: principles and implications·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 7, 2026

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

5.8K

Comparison versus reminding.

Jonathan G Tullis1, Robert L Goldstone2

  • 1Department of Educational Psychology, University of Arizona, 1430 E 2nd Street, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA.

Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
|February 10, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Reminding learners to recall prior information improved memory and generalization more than comparing new information. This study highlights how retrieval practice aids learning and transfer.

More Related Videos

Examining Recall Memory in Infancy and Early Childhood Using the Elicited Imitation Paradigm
06:35

Examining Recall Memory in Infancy and Early Childhood Using the Elicited Imitation Paradigm

Published on: April 28, 2016

35.6K
Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories
08:53

Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories

Published on: November 14, 2018

10.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 7, 2026

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

5.8K
Examining Recall Memory in Infancy and Early Childhood Using the Elicited Imitation Paradigm
06:35

Examining Recall Memory in Infancy and Early Childhood Using the Elicited Imitation Paradigm

Published on: April 28, 2016

35.6K
Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories
08:53

Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories

Published on: November 14, 2018

10.3K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Educational Psychology
  • Learning Sciences

Background:

  • Comparison and reminding are known learning strategies.
  • Comparison facilitates abstracting core concepts by ignoring superficial differences.
  • Reminding aids memory and generalization by linking new and old information.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the effects of comparison and reminding on memory and transfer.
  • To investigate which strategy better supports learning and generalization.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments were conducted using proverb pairs.
  • Participants studied related proverbs that were superficially different.
  • Conditions involved either comparing proverb pairs or being reminded of prior proverbs.

Main Results:

  • Reminding led to better proverb recall than comparison (Experiment 1).
  • The benefits of reminding for memory persisted over a one-week interval (Experiment 2).
  • Reminding improved generalization to new proverbs compared to comparison (Experiment 3).

Conclusions:

  • Reminding supports better memory for individual instances than comparison.
  • Reminding enhances transfer of learning to new situations more effectively than comparison.
  • Retrieval practice through reminding is a superior strategy for both memory and generalization.