Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Getting to know you: Gaze behaviours and biographical information in face-name associations.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same author

Regulation of interpersonal distance in virtual reality: Implications for socio-emotional functioning in late adulthood.

PloS one·2025
Same author

The Second Database of Emotional Videos from Ottawa (DEVO-2): Over 1300 brief video clips rated on valence, arousal, impact, and familiarity.

Behavior research methods·2025
Same author

Emotion Processing in Late Adulthood: The Effect of Emotional Valence and Face Age on Behavior and Scanning Patterns.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Survival of the fittest: genomic investigations of the bay scallop reveal a shift in population structure through a summer mortality event.

BMC genomics·2025
Same author

Chromosome-level genome assembly of the bay scallop Argopecten irradians.

Scientific data·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 7, 2026

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen
07:52

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Published on: October 5, 2020

4.1K

Faces elicit different scanning patterns depending on task demands.

Isabelle Boutet1, Chantal L Lemieux2, Marc-André Goulet2

  • 1School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, 136 Jean-Jacques-Lussier, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1N 6N5. iboutet@uottawa.ca.

Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
|February 11, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Facial recognition strategies shift based on task demands. When unaware of the task, the eyes guide face scanning; when aware of relational cues, the face center becomes the focus.

Keywords:
ConfiguralEye movementsFace perceptionHolisticInversion

More Related Videos

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

1.0K
Correlating Behavioral Responses to fMRI Signals from Human Prefrontal Cortex: Examining Cognitive Processes Using Task Analysis
10:33

Correlating Behavioral Responses to fMRI Signals from Human Prefrontal Cortex: Examining Cognitive Processes Using Task Analysis

Published on: June 20, 2012

13.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 7, 2026

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen
07:52

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Published on: October 5, 2020

4.1K
Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

1.0K
Correlating Behavioral Responses to fMRI Signals from Human Prefrontal Cortex: Examining Cognitive Processes Using Task Analysis
10:33

Correlating Behavioral Responses to fMRI Signals from Human Prefrontal Cortex: Examining Cognitive Processes Using Task Analysis

Published on: June 20, 2012

13.4K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Vision Science

Background:

  • Human face perception relies on processing both featural (individual parts) and configural (spatial relationships) information.
  • Understanding how these different information types influence visual attention during face discrimination is crucial for cognitive models.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether featural and configural information processing elicit distinct eye movement patterns.
  • To determine if knowledge of task relevance (configural vs. featural) alters face scanning strategies.
  • To examine the role of specific facial regions (e.g., eyes, center) in face scanning.

Main Methods:

  • Eye movements were recorded as participants performed face discrimination tasks.
  • Two experiments manipulated task predictability: random presentation (unaware) vs. blocked presentation (aware) of featural or configural trials.
  • Participants discriminated upright and inverted faces differing in featural or configural information.

Main Results:

  • Task demands significantly influence face scanning patterns.
  • When participants were unaware of the relevant information type, eye movements were primarily directed to the eyes.
  • When participants knew that configural information was relevant, scanning focused on the center of the face.

Conclusions:

  • Face perception employs dynamic scanning strategies that are modulated by task demands and prior knowledge.
  • Attention allocation during face processing is not fixed but adapts based on cognitive goals.
  • These findings highlight the flexibility of visual attention in navigating complex perceptual tasks.