Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 7, 2026

Metacarpal Small Incision for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Published on: April 5, 2024
Intracarpal shortening osteotomy for Kienböck's disease: A retrospective study of 28 cases
J Chevrollier1, G Pomares1, S Huguet1
1Centre chirurgical Émile-Gallé, 49, rue Hermite, 54000 Nancy, France.
Introduction:
Kienböck's disease is rare in patients with a neutral or positive ulnar variance. In these situations, treatment is challenging and controversial. Various intracarpal shortening osteotomy (ICSO) procedures have been proposed.
Objective:
Study the effect of the type of ICSO (isolated capitate osteotomy or combined with hamate osteotomy) on the clinical and radiological outcomes in a retrospective series.
Methods:
Patients with Kienböck's disease were treated with ICSO. A dorsal approach centered over the capitate was used. The transverse osteotomy was located 5mm below the capitate's proximal chondral boundary. The osteotomy cut was 2mm thick. In some patients, a hamate osteotomy was done at the same level as that of the capitate. The osteotomy site was fixed with staples. Cases were classified as with or without a vascularized bone graft was added to the ICSO.
Results:
There were 28 cases and the average follow-up was 43 months. Three patients required surgical revision. Pain relief at rest was achieved in all patients. The flexion/extension range of motion was 84°. Strength was 75% of the opposite side. The mean QuickDASH was 32.5 and the PRWE (Patient Related Wrist Evaluation) was 30.2. Isolated capitate osteotomy resulted in better satisfaction and improved ulnar/radial deviation and flexion range of motion. There was no difference in terms of pain, strength and functional scores. However, it triggered a significant increase in the radioscaphoid angle. Adding a vascularized bone graft did not impact the outcomes.
Discussion:
Isolated capitate osteotomy provides better outcomes than combined capitate/hamate osteotomy (satisfaction and wrist range of motion) and should be done as the primary procedure. However, since it increases the radioscaphoid angle more than combined capitate/hamate osteotomy, the latter procedure should be used when a large radioscaphoid angle exists preoperatively. We found no benefit of using a vascularized graft.
Level Of Evidence:
IV.

