Two stable variants of Burkholderia pseudomallei strain MSHR5848 express broadly divergent in vitro phenotypes

A A Shea1, R C Bernhards2, C K Cote2

  • 1Diagnostic Systems Division, USAMRIID, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.

Plos One
|February 11, 2017
PubMed

Insights

Burkholderia pseudomallei exhibits two stable colony variants, Smooth and Rough, with distinct metabolic and virulence differences. These variants offer insights into phenotypic variability and potential infection markers.

Area of Science:

  • Microbiology
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Bacterial Pathogenesis

Background:

  • Burkholderia pseudomallei (Bp) causes melioidosis, a severe disease with no existing vaccine.
  • Bp is highly infectious, causes nonspecific symptoms, and is antibiotic-resistant.
  • Strain MSHR5848 displayed two stable colony variants: Smooth and Rough.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To characterize the phenotypic and genotypic differences between Bp Smooth and Rough variants.
  • To understand the mechanisms of Bp phenotypic variability.
  • To identify potential in vitro markers of infection.

Main Methods:

  • Culturing and passage of Smooth and Rough variants.
  • Microscopic and differential media analysis.
  • Antimicrobial susceptibility testing and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) characterization.
  • Phenotype microarray analysis.
  • In vivo virulence studies (lethal dose in mice).
  • In vitro macrophage assays (phagocytosis, replication, cytotoxicity).
  • Genetic analyses: MLST, ribotyping, whole genome sequencing.

Main Results:

  • Smooth and Rough variants showed distinct colony morphologies and differential media growth.
  • Rough variant metabolized sugars in selective agar; Smooth grew faster in vitro.
  • Rough variant had a 10-fold lower lethal dose in mice than Smooth.
  • Smooth variant was more cytotoxic, phagocytosed, and replicated more in macrophages.
  • Genetic analyses revealed high conservation with only one consistent genetic difference.

Conclusions:

  • Bp variants exhibit significant phenotypic and virulence disparities despite genetic similarity.
  • These variants provide a model to study Bp phenotypic plasticity.
  • Identified differences may serve as potential in vitro markers for Bp infection.

Related Concept Videos

Modern Molecular Taxonomy01:29

Modern Molecular Taxonomy

Advancements in molecular biology have revolutionized the identification and characterization of bacteria, with multiple methods leveraging DNA sequencing for enhanced precision. As sequencing technologies improve and costs decline, these approaches are increasingly used in clinical, environmental, and evolutionary studies.Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST) examines several housekeeping genes, essential chromosomal genes encoding cellular functions, to distinguish strains. Approximately...
Regulation of Bacterial Virulence01:28

Regulation of Bacterial Virulence

Pathogenic bacteria employ a range of regulatory mechanisms to modulate the expression of virulence genes in response to environmental and host-derived signals. These mechanisms ensure that virulence factors are expressed only under favorable conditions, thereby optimizing infection and survival strategies.Mechanisms of Virulence RegulationKey regulatory strategies include:Two-Component Systems: These consist of a membrane-bound sensor kinase and a cytoplasmic response regulator. Environmental...
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance01:25

Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) presents a critical public health threat, arising from its capacity to resist β-lactam antibiotics due to acquisition of the mecA gene within the staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec). This gene encodes penicillin-binding protein 2a (PBP2a), which impairs binding efficacy of methicillin and other β-lactams. MRSA has evolved into distinct clonal lineages impacting humans and animals alike, reinforcing its significance within the One...