A retrospective analysis of catheter-based sources in intravascular brachytherapy
J DeCunha1, C Janicki2, S A Enger3
1Department of Physics, Medical Physics Unit, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Insights
Current intravascular brachytherapy (IVBT) planning overestimates radiation dose. This study modeled plaque, stent, and guidewire effects, revealing significant dose reductions in coronary artery disease treatment, necessitating improved planning for effective radiotherapy.
Area of Science:
- Medical Physics
- Radiation Oncology
- Cardiovascular Disease
Background:
- Coronary artery disease (CAD) and restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) are major health concerns.
- In-stent restenosis (ISR) following PTCA with stenting is a significant complication.
- Intravascular brachytherapy (IVBT) is used to treat ISR, but current treatment planning (TP) is limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a novel model accounting for multiple inhomogeneities (plaque, stent, guidewire) in IVBT treatment planning.
- To determine if radiation attenuation by multiple inhomogeneities combines linearly or results in greater-than-anticipated dose reduction.
- To evaluate the spatial distribution of radiation dose around the source and within arterial walls during IVBT.
Main Methods:
- A dosimetric analysis of two commercial IVBT systems was conducted using Monte Carlo particle simulations (Geant4).
- Absorbed dose calculations were performed using a detailed model of a human coronary artery incorporating calcified plaque and a stent.
- Dose delivered in water was also calculated to assess the accuracy of the standard water approximation in TP.
Main Results:
- Significant dose variations were observed around IVBT sources, with dose reductions up to 66% due to combined plaque, stent, and guidewire presence.
- For the Guidant Galileo system, dose behind stent struts was reduced by 20%, and up to 66% with occluding elements.
- For the Novoste Beta Cath device, similar dose reductions of 19% and 58% were noted in comparable regions.
Conclusions:
- The water approximation in clinical IVBT TP is inaccurate when significant inhomogeneities are present.
- Existing methods for calculating dose perturbations may underestimate the actual dose reduction.
- Improved IVBT strategies, potentially involving new radioisotopes or off-centering devices, are needed for complex lesions.
Purpose:
Coronary artery disease involves the deposition of plaque along the walls of a coronary artery leading to narrowed or blocked vessels (stenosis) and is one of the main causes of death in developed countries. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) is used to reverse stenosis. Restenosis (renarrowing) of the treated vessel is a major complication of PTCA. A metal mesh tube (stent) can be placed inside the vessel to prevent restenosis. Tissue stress incurred during PTCA and stenting can provoke neointimal cell proliferation leading to in-stent restenosis (ISR). Intravascular brachytherapy (IVBT), a form of internal radiotherapy, is used to treat ISR. Renewed interest in IVBT is being expressed as a treatment for patients with ISR in drug-eluting stents. Current treatment planning (TP) of IVBT is extremely limited and assumes human tissue can be approximated by water. The interactions of arterial plaque, guidewires, and the stent have been shown to attenuate radiation significantly but are ignored in TP. Other models have determined the degree of attenuation by each factor in isolation. For the first time, we create a model with several inhomogenities present to determine whether attenuation by multiple inhomogenities combines linearly or if a larger dose reduction than anticipated is realized. We are also able to evaluate a spatial distribution of dose around the source and in arterial walls.
Methods And Materials:
A dosimetric analysis of two commercially available IVBT systems was performed in a Monte Carlo-based particle simulation (Geant4). Absorbed dose was calculated using a model of a human coronary artery with a calcified plaque and stent. Dose delivered in water was also calculated to evaluate the accuracy of a water approximation.
Results:
Dose as a function of θ shows significant variation around IVBT sources. For the Guidant Galileo, dose is reduced by 20% behind stent struts and as much as 66% in a region occluded by the guidewire, plaque, and stent. For the Novoste Beta Cath device, delivered dose is reduced by 19% and 58%, respectively, in the same regions.
Conclusions:
Our findings show that the water approximation used in clinical practice to calculate dose is inaccurate when inhomogeneities are present. Methods proposed for calculating dose perturbations in IVBT may underestimate the magnitude of dose reduction. Increasing source dwell time seems unlikely to resolve dosimetric issues in IVBT. The effectiveness of currently existing β-emitting devices may be reduced in patients with complex lesions at the treatment site. Investigation of new radioisotopes and off-centering devices should be considered to improve dose outcomes.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview


