Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 7, 2026

Electrocardiogram Recordings in Anesthetized Mice using Lead II
Published on: June 20, 2020
Renal sympathetic stimulation and ablation affect ventricular arrhythmia by modulating autonomic activity in a
Lilei Yu1, Bing Huang1, Xiaoya Zhou1
1Department of Cardiology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University; Cardiovascular Research Institute, Wuhan University; Hubei Key Laboratory of Cardiology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Background:
Our previous studies showed that renal sympathetic stimulation (RS) may facilitate ischemic ventricular arrhythmia (VA) by increasing left stellate ganglion (LSG) nerve activity, whereas renal sympathetic ablation (RA) may suppress VA.
Objective:
The purpose of this study was to investigate whether renal sympathetic interventions also can affect VA by modulating LSG activity in a cesium-induced long QT canine model.
Methods:
Twenty-four dogs were randomly divided into RS group (n = 8), RA group (n = 8), or control group (n = 8). Serum norepinephrine, LSG function, and LSG neural activity were measured before and 3 hours after RS or RA. Increasing doses of cesium chloride then were administered until a "threshold dose" produced sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation. Early afterdepolarization amplitude, VA prevalence, and tachycardia threshold dose were compared among these groups. Nerve growth factor and c-fos protein expressed in the LSG also were examined.
Results:
Serum norepinephrine, LSG function, and LSG neural activity were all significantly increased after 3 hours of RS and all were decreased 3 hours after RA. In addition, RS significantly decreased the tachycardia threshold dose, increased the early afterdepolarization amplitude, facilitated the incidence of VAs, and increased the expression of nerve growth factor and c-fos protein. In contrast, RA induced the opposite effects.
Conclusion:
RS promotes, whereas RA suppresses, the incidence of VAs in a canine model of cesium-induced long QT. Modulation of LSG neural activity by RS and RA may be responsible for these different effects.
More Related Videos
12:15Tissue Preparation Techniques for Contrast-Enhanced Micro Computed Tomography Imaging of Large Mammalian Cardiac Models with Chronic Disease
Published on: February 8, 2022
12:45Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Related Concept Videos
ECG Interpretation of Arrhythmias II: Atrial, Junctional and Ventricular Arrhythmias
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class II Agents as β-Adrenergic Blockers
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class IV Agents as Calcium Channel Blockers
Verapamil, a calcium channel blocker, inhibits calcium movement across myocardial cell membranes and vascular smooth muscle. This results in the dilation of coronary and...
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class III Agents as Potassium Channel Blockers
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class I Agents as Sodium Channel Blockers
Class 1A Antiarrhythmic Drugs: These drugs work by moderately blocking sodium channels,...