Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 7, 2026

Group Synchronization During Collaborative Drawing Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy
Published on: August 5, 2022
Academic judgments under uncertainty: A study of collective anchoring effects in Swedish Research Council panel
1Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (Score), Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Abstract:
This article focuses on anchoring effects in the process of peer reviewing research proposals. Anchoring effects are commonly seen as the result of flaws in human judgment, as cognitive biases that stem from specific heuristics that guide people when they involve their intuition in solving a problem. Here, the cognitive biases will be analyzed from a sociological point of view, as interactional and aggregated phenomena. The article is based on direct observations of ten panel groups evaluating research proposals in the natural and engineering sciences for the Swedish Research Council. The analysis suggests that collective anchoring effects emerge as a result of the combination of the evaluation techniques that are being used (grading scales and average ranking) and the efforts of the evaluators to reach consensus in the face of disagreements and uncertainty in the group. What many commentators and evaluators have interpreted as an element of chance in the peer review process may also be understood as partly a result of the dynamic aspects of collective anchoring effects.
Related Concept Videos
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
Impact of Groups on Individuals
Social Proof
Impact of Groups on Groups
Group Polarization
Robbers Cave

