Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion01:24

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

4.0K
A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
4.0K
Bonferroni Test01:10

Bonferroni Test

3.5K
The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
3.5K
Introduction to Test of Independence01:21

Introduction to Test of Independence

3.0K
In statistics, the term independence means that one can directly obtain the probability of any event involving both variables by multiplying their individual probabilities. Tests of independence are chi-square tests involving the use of a contingency table of observed (data) values.
The test statistic for a test of independence is similar to that of a goodness-of-fit test:
3.0K
Test for Homogeneity01:23

Test for Homogeneity

2.5K
The goodness–of–fit test can be used to decide whether a population fits a given distribution, but it will not suffice to decide whether two populations follow the same unknown distribution. A different test, called the test for homogeneity, can be used to conclude whether two populations have the same distribution. To calculate the test statistic for a test for homogeneity, follow the same procedure as with the test of independence. The hypotheses for the test for homogeneity can...
2.5K
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

527
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
527
Binomial Probability Distribution01:15

Binomial Probability Distribution

16.2K
A binomial distribution is a probability distribution for a procedure with a fixed number of trials, where each trial can have only two outcomes.
The outcomes of a binomial experiment fit a binomial probability distribution. A statistical experiment can be classified as a binomial experiment if the following conditions are met:
There are a fixed number of trials. Think of trials as repetitions of an experiment. The letter n denotes the number of trials.
There are only two possible outcomes,...
16.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mediastinal lymph node dissection in older adults with radiologically pure-solid stage I lung cancer.

Surgical oncology·2026
Same author

Epidemiology and clinical course of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung: The Japanese lung cancer registry study.

Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2025
Same author

Chest Tube Drainage, Bone Radiotherapy, and Brain Radiotherapy in Advanced Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis of Associated Factors and Survival.

Thoracic cancer·2025
Same author

Survival benefit and potential markers of chemotherapy for elderly and poor performance status patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Results from the Japanese Joint Committee of lung cancer registry database.

Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2025
Same author

Predictors of nodal upstaging in clinical N1 nonsmall cell lung cancer.

Japanese journal of clinical oncology·2024
Same author

Surgically resected sarcomatoid carcinoma of the lung: a nationwide retrospective study in 2010.

BMC cancer·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 7, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.7K

On Stratified Adjusted Tests by Binomial Trials.

Asanao Shimokawa1, Etsuo Miyaoka1

  • 1.

The International Journal of Biostatistics
|February 15, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces new statistical tests for randomized clinical trials with varying stratum sizes. The proposed method improves accuracy and maintains type I error rates, especially with smaller patient groups.

Keywords:
binary datarandom stratum sizesrisk differencetype I error

More Related Videos

A Real-world What-Where-When Memory Test
09:13

A Real-world What-Where-When Memory Test

Published on: May 16, 2017

12.1K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 7, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.7K
A Real-world What-Where-When Memory Test
09:13

A Real-world What-Where-When Memory Test

Published on: May 16, 2017

12.1K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.3K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Design

Background:

  • Adjusting for covariates is crucial for estimating treatment effects in clinical trials.
  • Traditional stratified tests (Cochran, Mantel-Haenszel) assume fixed stratum sizes, which is often not practical.
  • Varying stratum sizes can lead to errors in estimated test statistic variation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop novel test statistics for randomized clinical trials with variable stratum sizes.
  • To address limitations of existing methods when stratum sizes are not fixed.
  • To improve the accuracy of treatment effect estimation in such scenarios.

Main Methods:

  • Proposed new test statistics based on multinomial distributions.
  • Developed methods applicable to both fixed and completely randomized trial designs.
  • Utilized simulation studies to evaluate performance.

Main Results:

  • The new approach maintains type I error rates more effectively than traditional methods.
  • Proposed tests provide more conservative results with small patient numbers.
  • Differences between new and traditional tests are minimal with large patient cohorts.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed multinomial distribution-based tests offer a more robust solution for clinical trials with variable stratum sizes.
  • This approach enhances the reliability of treatment effect estimation.
  • The new methods ensure better control of statistical errors in practical trial settings.