Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

MoRE-Net: An Interpretable and Modality-robust Model for Brain Tumor Grading.

Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine·2026
Same author

Swelling Property and Metal Adsorption of Dialdehyde Crosslinked Poly Aspartate/Alginate Gel Beads.

Polymers·2026
Same author

Hydrophobic Modification of Alginate Nanofibrous Membrane by Group IV Elements Ion Crosslinking.

Polymers·2026
Same author

Mirror Descent and Exponentiated Gradient Algorithms Using Trace-Form Entropies.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Electroencephalogram-Based Sustained Attention Assessment Using Sparse Model for Feature Selection.

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference·2025
Same author

Ictal phase-amplitude coupling as a biomarker for seizure onset zone in neocortical epilepsy.

Frontiers in neurology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 7, 2026

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness
07:37

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness

Published on: August 1, 2017

9.7K

A comparison study of visually stimulated brain-computer and eye-tracking interfaces.

Kaori Suefusa1, Toshihisa Tanaka

  • 1Department of Electronic and Information Engineering, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, 2-24-16 Nakacho, Koganei-shi, Tokyo, 184-8588, Japan.

Journal of Neural Engineering
|February 16, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) and eye-tracking interfaces (ETIs) show comparable performance. BCIs outperform ETIs for smaller visual targets, informing interface design and selection for diverse applications.

More Related Videos

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

16.5K
How to Build a Dichoptic Presentation System That Includes an Eye Tracker
05:48

How to Build a Dichoptic Presentation System That Includes an Eye Tracker

Published on: September 6, 2017

9.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 7, 2026

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness
07:37

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness

Published on: August 1, 2017

9.7K
Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

16.5K
How to Build a Dichoptic Presentation System That Includes an Eye Tracker
05:48

How to Build a Dichoptic Presentation System That Includes an Eye Tracker

Published on: September 6, 2017

9.0K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) and eye-tracking interfaces (ETIs) are distinct assistive technologies.
  • Limited research exists comparing their performance on a unified experimental platform.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantitatively compare the performance of steady-state visual evoked potential-based BCIs and dwelling-based ETIs.
  • To evaluate performance across different target sizes.

Main Methods:

  • Subjects performed a target selection task using both BCI and ETI.
  • Recognition accuracy and information transfer rate were measured.
  • Targets were presented in three sizes: 20mm, 40mm, and 60mm.

Main Results:

  • BCIs and ETIs demonstrated comparable accuracy and information transfer rates.
  • BCIs significantly outperformed ETIs when targets were small.
  • Performance varied with target size.

Conclusions:

  • The choice between BCI and ETI can be optimized based on target size and application context.
  • Findings guide improved interface design and selection for enhanced user experience.