Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Prosopagnosia

Prosopagnosia

Prosopagnosia, also known as face blindness, is the inability to recognize faces. In severe cases, individuals with prosopagnosia may not recognize close family members, including parents and spouses, by their faces. For instance, someone with prosopagnosia might walk past their child in a crowd, only realizing their mistake upon noticing their child's distinctive backpack or favorite jacket. Prosopagnosia specifically impairs facial recognition, while the recognition of other objects or...

Visual Agnosia

Visual Agnosia

Visual agnosia is a condition characterized by the inability to recognize visually presented objects despite having normal vision. For instance, a person with visual agnosia can describe the shape and color of an object but cannot identify or name it. This impairment does not affect their visual field, acuity, color vision, brightness discrimination, language, or memory. An example of this condition in a social setting is someone at a dinner party asking for "that silver thing with a round...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

FoMo: A unifying theory of visual foraging.

PLoS computational biology·2026

Same author

Measuring visual discomfort - a novel two-step method for reducing criterion effects when measuring subjective responses.

Vision research·2026

Same author

Designing a test battery for real-world visual search.

Scientific reports·2025

Same author

Visual search efficiency is modulated by symmetry type and texture regularity.

Journal of vision·2025

Same author

Learn more from your data with asymptotic regression.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2025

Same author

Corrigendum: Where's Wally: the influence of visual salience on referring expression generation.

Frontiers in psychology·2024

Same journal

Correction to: 'In search of the genetic variants of human sex ratio at birth: was Fisher wrong about sex ratio evolution?' (2024), by Song & Zhang.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026

Same journal

Landscape context affects physiological but not genetic proxies of butterfly movement.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026

Same journal

Visual attention-related processes in desert locusts' collective-motion-related decision-making.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026

Same journal

The prolonged reemergence of megapredatory pelagic fishes.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026

Same journal

Background check: mutational input to size variation depends on ancestor's breeding value.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026

Same journal

Reconstructing the viral histories of human, simian and prosimian immunodeficiency viruses across multiple evolutionary timescales.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 7, 2026

Simultaneous Eye Tracking and Single-Neuron Recordings in Human Epilepsy Patients

Simultaneous Eye Tracking and Single-Neuron Recordings in Human Epilepsy Patients

Published on: June 17, 2019

Human visual search behaviour is far from ideal.

Anna Nowakowska¹, Alasdair D F Clarke^2,3, Amelia R Hunt²

¹Department of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, Room T32, William Guild Building, King's College, Aberdeen, UK a.nowakowska@abdn.ac.uk.

Proceedings. Biological Sciences

|February 17, 2017

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Human eye movements during visual search are not always efficient. Participants fixated on less informative areas, suggesting a trade-off between speed and certainty, and a failure to prioritize novel information during visual foraging.

Keywords:

eye movements optimal behaviour visual search

More Related Videos

Characterizing the Relationship Between Eye Movement Parameters and Cognitive Functions in Non-demented Parkinson's Disease Patients with Eye Tracking

Characterizing the Relationship Between Eye Movement Parameters and Cognitive Functions in Non-demented Parkinson's Disease Patients with Eye Tracking

Published on: September 26, 2019

Methods to Test Visual Attention Online

Methods to Test Visual Attention Online

Published on: February 19, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 7, 2026

Simultaneous Eye Tracking and Single-Neuron Recordings in Human Epilepsy Patients

Simultaneous Eye Tracking and Single-Neuron Recordings in Human Epilepsy Patients

Published on: June 17, 2019

Characterizing the Relationship Between Eye Movement Parameters and Cognitive Functions in Non-demented Parkinson's Disease Patients with Eye Tracking

Characterizing the Relationship Between Eye Movement Parameters and Cognitive Functions in Non-demented Parkinson's Disease Patients with Eye Tracking

Published on: September 26, 2019

Methods to Test Visual Attention Online

Methods to Test Visual Attention Online

Published on: February 19, 2015

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Neuroscience
Behavioral Ecology

Background:

Foraging behaviors in nature are often highly efficient due to evolutionary pressures.
Human eye movements during visual search serve as a model for understanding foraging strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the efficiency of human eye movements during visual search tasks.
To identify factors contributing to search inefficiency in visual foraging.

Main Methods:

Participants searched for targets in homogeneous and heterogeneous arrays of line segments.
Compound arrays (heterogeneous on one side, homogeneous on the other) were used to assess fixation strategies.
Search performance was compared to estimates based on uniform arrays.

Main Results:

Participants made numerous fixations on the homogeneous side of compound arrays, contrary to optimal search strategy.
Two key inefficiencies were identified: superfluous fixations for perceived certainty and failure to direct fixations towards areas with the most new information.

Conclusions:

Human visual search is not always optimized for speed or information gain.
Participants exhibit suboptimal fixation patterns, potentially sacrificing efficiency for response certainty and neglecting information-rich areas.