Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 7, 2026

11:19
Robotic Myotomy and Partial Fundoplication for Achalasia
Published on: August 11, 2023
2.1K
Robotic cardiac surgery in Brazil.
Robinson Poffo1, Alisson P Toschi1, Renato B Pope1
1Centro de Cirurgia Cardíaca Minimamente Invasiva e Robótica, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery
|February 17, 2017
Summary
Robotic cardiac surgery (RCS) in Brazil is feasible, safe, and effective for various heart conditions. This study shows positive short- and mid-term outcomes, with low complication rates and good patient recovery.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
- Medical Technology Innovation
Background:
- Brazil is a key player in South American medical technology development.
- Robotic cardiac surgery (RCS) has seen rapid advancement since 2010.
- The DaVinci® robotic system was first used in Latin America in 2010.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the short- and mid-term results of robotic cardiac surgery in Brazil.
- To assess the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of RCS for diverse cardiac pathologies.
Main Methods:
- A consecutive series of 39 patients underwent RCS between March 2010 and December 2015.
- Procedures included mitral valve surgery, atrial fibrillation treatment, septal defect closure, tumor resection, coronary artery bypass, and pericardiectomy.
- Patient demographics included a mean age of 51.3 years and mean ejection fraction of 62%.
Main Results:
- Mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was 154.9 minutes; aortic cross-clamp time was 114.48 minutes.
- 82% of patients were extubated in the operating room; median ICU and hospital stays were 1 and 5 days, respectively.
- No conversions to sternotomy or intra-operative complications occurred; 100% follow-up with two early, unrelated deaths and no re-operations.
Conclusions:
- RCS is a feasible, safe, and effective option for various cardiac conditions in Brazil.
- Challenges to RCS adoption in Brazil include limited clinical application, lack of specific training, and high technology costs.
Keywords:
Coronary artery bypassMinimally invasive surgeryatrial septal defectrobotic surgeryvalve surgery
