Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Genome Copying Errors

Genome Copying Errors

DNA replication is a well-evolved process that copies millions of base pairs with high fidelity during each cell division. Occasionally a wrong base or a long stretch of wrong bases may get added to the daughter strands. If the errors are left unchecked, cells might accumulate several mutations that might endanger their survival. Therefore, the copying errors are checked and repaired at three levels.

Mismatch Repair

Mismatch Repair

Mismatch Repair

Mismatch Repair

Organisms are capable of detecting and fixing nucleotide mismatches that occur during DNA replication. This sophisticated process requires identifying the new strand and replacing the erroneous bases with correct nucleotides. Mismatch repair is coordinated by many proteins in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes.
The Mutator Protein Family Plays a Key Role in DNA Mismatch Repair
The human genome has more than 3 billion base pairs of DNA per cell. Prior to cell division, that vast amount of genetic...

Next-generation Sequencing

Next-generation Sequencing

The first human genome sequencing project cost $2.7 billion and was declared complete in 2003, after 15 years of international cooperation and collaboration between several research teams and funding agencies. Today, with the advent of next-generation sequencing technologies, the cost and time of sequencing a human genome have dropped over 100 fold.
Next-Generation Sequencing Methods
Although all next-generation methods use different technologies, they all share a set of standard features....

Improving Translational Accuracy

Improving Translational Accuracy

Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...

Improving Translational Accuracy

Improving Translational Accuracy

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Spatial transcriptomics in cancer research: insights into tumorigenesis, diagnosis and therapeutics.

Cell death discovery·2026

Same author

The ArMAPK5-ArbHLH3-Ar4CL3 module is associated with salicylic acid-induced phenolic biosynthesis in Agastache rugosa.

Plant physiology and biochemistry : PPB·2026

Same author

A novel two-in-one Eu-MOFs integrates electrochemiluminescence and ratiometric fluorescence dual-mode sensor for tetracycline detection.

Biosensors & bioelectronics·2026

Same author

A heterozygous deletion and inversion at the NHEJ1‑IHH locus associated with shank length in Yunlong short-leg chicken.

BMC genomics·2026

Same author

Unified Modulation Matrix-Based Shared Control for Teleoperated Multi-Robot Formation and Obstacle Avoidance.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026

Same author

Fusion attention-based nasopharyngeal carcinoma segmentation model in predicting the clinical outcome of cervical lymph node residue after IMRT.

BMC medical imaging·2026

Same journal

Cross-Domain Transfer Learning from Peptides to Metabolites Using a Multi-Property Fine-Tuned LLM.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026

Same journal

Biomedical Concept Recognition with Error-aware Negative-enhanced Ranking Framework.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026

Same journal

TEDLH: Domain HMMs for sensitive detection of remote homologues.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026

Same journal

PLNFGL: Joint Estimation of Multi-Condition Gene Networks from Single-cell RNA-seq Data.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026

Same journal

MCFST: Spatial domain identification method based on multi-view graph convolutional network and graph fusion network.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026

Same journal

SpaBiT: Enhancing Spatial Transcriptomics Resolution via Bidirectional Attention Transformers.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 7, 2026

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

MapReduce for accurate error correction of next-generation sequencing data.

Liang Zhao^1,2, Qingfeng Chen¹, Wencui Li²

¹School of Computing and Electronic Information, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)

|February 17, 2017

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces MEC, a novel method for correcting errors in next-generation sequencing data. MEC significantly outperforms existing techniques, achieving the lowest error rates and highest correction gains.

More Related Videos

Detection of Rare Mutations in CtDNA Using Next Generation Sequencing

Detection of Rare Mutations in CtDNA Using Next Generation Sequencing

Published on: August 24, 2017

Using Next Generation Sequencing to Identify Mutations Associated with Repair of a CAS9-induced Double Strand Break Near the CD4 Promoter

Using Next Generation Sequencing to Identify Mutations Associated with Repair of a CAS9-induced Double Strand Break Near the CD4 Promoter

Published on: March 31, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 7, 2026

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

Detection of Rare Mutations in CtDNA Using Next Generation Sequencing

Detection of Rare Mutations in CtDNA Using Next Generation Sequencing

Published on: August 24, 2017

Using Next Generation Sequencing to Identify Mutations Associated with Repair of a CAS9-induced Double Strand Break Near the CD4 Promoter

Using Next Generation Sequencing to Identify Mutations Associated with Repair of a CAS9-induced Double Strand Break Near the CD4 Promoter

Published on: March 31, 2022

Area of Science:

Genomics
Bioinformatics
Computational Biology

Background:

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) generates vast amounts of data crucial for genetic research.
NGS data contains significant machine-induced errors, with substitution errors up to 2.5%.
Current error-correction methods are imperfect, sometimes introducing more errors than they fix, and underutilize cloud computing.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop a highly effective error-correction method for NGS data.
To leverage cloud computing for efficient error correction.
To improve the accuracy and reliability of genomic sequence data.

Main Methods:

Introduced MEC, a novel error-correction method.
Employed a two-layered MapReduce technique for parallel processing and statistically reliable corrections.
Grouped sequences to identify candidate erroneous bases in parallel (layer 1).
Linked erroneous bases at the same position across groups for correction (layer 2).

Main Results:

MEC demonstrated superior performance compared to existing methods on real and simulated datasets.
Achieved the consistently lowest per-position error rate.
Yielded the highest correction gain among tested methods.

Conclusions:

MEC offers a significant advancement in NGS data error correction.
The method's efficiency and accuracy make it valuable for genomic research.
The approach effectively utilizes parallel processing for robust error correction.