Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 7, 2026

Tumor Treating Field Therapy in Combination with Bevacizumab for the Treatment of Recurrent Glioblastoma
Published on: October 27, 2014
A Phase II Randomized Trial (GO27827) of First-Line FOLFOX Plus Bevacizumab with or Without the MET Inhibitor
Johanna C Bendell1, Howard Hochster2, Lowell L Hart3
1Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, Tennessee, USA jbendell@tnonc.com.
Background:
Dysregulated hepatocyte growth factor/mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) signaling is associated with poor prognosis and resistance to vascular endothelial growth factor inhibition in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We report outcomes from a double-blind, multicenter phase II trial of the MET inhibitor onartuzumab in combination with mFOLFOX-6 and bevacizumab for mCRC (GO27827; NCT01418222).
Materials And Methods:
Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive onartuzumab (10 mg/kg intravenously [IV]) or placebo plus mFOLFOX-6 and bevacizumab (5 mg/kg IV). Oxaliplatin was given for 8-12 cycles; other agents were continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or death. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) in the intent-to-treat (ITT) and MET immunohistochemistry (IHC) expression-positive populations.
Results:
Between September 2011 and November 2012, 194 patients were enrolled. In September 2013, an interim analysis recommended stopping onartuzumab treatment due to lack of efficacy. At the time of the final analysis in February 2014, no significant improvement in PFS was seen with onartuzumab versus placebo in either the ITT or MET IHC-positive populations. An improvement in PFS was noted in the MET IHC-negative population. Neither overall survival nor response rate was improved with onartuzumab. The incidence of fatigue, peripheral edema, and deep vein thrombosis was increased with onartuzumab relative to placebo.
Conclusion:
Onartuzumab combined with mFOLFOX-6 and bevacizumab did not significantly improve efficacy outcomes in either the ITT or MET IHC-positive populations. MET expression by IHC was not a predictive biomarker in this setting. 2017;22:264-271 IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The addition of onartuzumab to mFOLFOX-6 plus bevacizumab did not improve outcomes in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer in this randomized, phase II study. Although initial results with onartuzumab were promising, a number of phase II/III clinical trials have reported a lack of improvement in efficacy with onartuzumab combined with standard-of-care therapies in several tumor types. Furthermore, negative study data have been published for rilotumumab and ficlatuzumab, both of which block hepatocyte growth factor binding to the mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) receptor. MET immunohistochemistry was not a predictive biomarker. It remains to be seen if other biomarkers or small molecule inhibitors may be more appropriate for inhibiting this oncogenic pathway.
Insights
Adding onartuzumab to standard chemotherapy did not improve outcomes for metastatic colorectal cancer patients. MET expression was not a predictive biomarker, and further research into other inhibitors is needed.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Molecular Biology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Dysregulated hepatocyte growth factor/mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) signaling is linked to poor prognosis and resistance to VEGF inhibition in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
- MET pathway dysregulation presents a therapeutic target in mCRC.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of onartuzumab, a MET inhibitor, in combination with mFOLFOX-6 and bevacizumab for mCRC.
- To determine if MET immunohistochemistry (IHC) expression is a predictive biomarker for treatment response.
Main Methods:
- A double-blind, multicenter, randomized phase II trial (GO27827) involving 194 mCRC patients.
- Patients received either onartuzumab or placebo plus mFOLFOX-6 and bevacizumab.
- Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) in intent-to-treat (ITT) and MET IHC-positive populations.
Main Results:
- Onartuzumab did not significantly improve PFS compared to placebo in the ITT or MET IHC-positive populations.
- An improvement in PFS was observed in the MET IHC-negative population.
- No improvement in overall survival or response rate was noted; increased fatigue, edema, and DVT were observed with onartuzumab.
Conclusions:
- Onartuzumab in combination with mFOLFOX-6 and bevacizumab did not improve efficacy outcomes in previously untreated mCRC patients.
- MET IHC expression was not a predictive biomarker in this trial.
- Further investigation into alternative biomarkers and small molecule inhibitors targeting the MET pathway is warranted.
Related Concept Videos
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Drugs for Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis in IBD

