Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 7, 2026

Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
Effect of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Survival in Patients with Stable Ischemic Heart Disease
Francisco Ujueta1, Ephraim N Weiss1, Binita Shah1
1Department of Medicine Division of Cardiology New York VA Healthcare Network and New York University School of Medicine, 423 East 23rd Street, New York, NY, 10010, USA.
Insights
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may relieve symptoms in stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD) but does not improve survival. Current evidence suggests PCI does not prolong life in SIHD patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD) affects numerous patients worldwide.
- Optimal management strategies for SIHD remain a focus of clinical research.
- Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a common revascularization procedure.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on survival rates in patients with stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD).
- To review the evidence regarding the efficacy of PCI versus optimal medical therapy for SIHD.
Main Methods:
- The International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches (ISCHEMIA) trial is a large randomized trial.
- The ISCHEMIA trial compares initial coronary revascularization (PCI or surgery) with optimal medical therapy alone in SIHD patients.
- Analysis of existing randomized trials assessing PCI for SIHD survival benefits.
Main Results:
- Prior randomized trials have generally shown no survival benefit with PCI in SIHD.
- Cardiac events post-PCI often occur in non-stented segments due to plaque rupture.
- The ISCHEMIA trial is unlikely to demonstrate a survival benefit specifically for PCI, though revascularization may benefit high-risk groups.
Conclusions:
- While PCI can alleviate symptoms in SIHD, it does not appear to prolong survival.
- Optimal medical therapy remains a cornerstone of SIHD management.
- Further research, including the ISCHEMIA trial, will refine understanding of revascularization strategies in SIHD.
Purpose Of Review:
This study aims to determine if percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) does improve survival in stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD).
Recent Findings:
The International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches (ISCHEMIA) trial will evaluate patients with moderate to severe ischemia and will be the largest randomized trial of an initial management strategy of coronary revascularization (percutaneous or surgical) versus optimal medical therapy alone for SIHD. Although the ISCHEMIA trial may show a benefit with upfront coronary revascularization in this high-risk population, cardiac events after PCI are largely caused by plaque rupture in segments outside of the original stented segment. Furthermore, given the robust data from prior randomized trials, which showed no survival benefit with PCI, and the likelihood that the highest risk patients in ISCHEMIA will be treated with surgery, it is unlikely that the ISCHEMIA trial will show a survival benefit particular to PCI.
Recent Findings:
Although PCI relieves symptoms, the evidence base indicates that it does not prolong survival in SIHD.
More Related Videos
05:41Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Ligation for Ischemia-Reperfusion Research: Model Improvement via Technical Modifications and Quality Control
Published on: December 16, 2022
04:30A Murine Model of Stent Implantation in the Carotid Artery for the Study of Restenosis
Published on: May 14, 2013
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Angina IV: Management