Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 7, 2026

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
Population-Level Differences in Rectal Cancer Survival in Uninsured Patients Are Partially Explained by Differences
Dianne Pulte1,2, Lina Jansen3, Hermann Brenner3,4,5,6
1Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research pultedi@gmail.com.
Background:
Rectal cancer (RC) is a common malignancy with a substantial mortality but good survival for patients with optimally treated nonmetastatic disease. Lack of insurance may compromise access to care and therefore compromise survival. Here, we examine RC survival by insurance type.
Methods:
Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database were used to determine 1- to 3-year survival for patients with RC by insurance type (Medicaid, uninsured, other insurance).
Results:
Patients with Medicaid or no insurance presented at later stages and were less likely to receive definitive surgery. Overall 3-year survival was higher for patients with other insurance compared with Medicaid-insured (+22.2% units) and uninsured (+18.8% units) patients. Major differences in survival were still observed after adjustment for stage. When patients with stage II and III RC were considered, 3-year survival was higher for patients with other insurance versus those with Medicaid (+16.2% units) and uninsured patients (+12.2% units). However, when the analysis was limited to patients with stage II and III disease who received radiation therapy followed by definitive surgery, the difference decreased to +11.8% units and +7.3% units, respectively, for Medicaid and no insurance.
Conclusion:
For patients with stage II and III RC, much of the difference in survival between uninsured patients and those with insurance other than Medicaid can be explained by differences in treatment. Further efforts to determine the cause of residual differences as well as efforts to improve access to standard-of-care treatment for uninsured patients may improve population-level survival for RC. 2017;22:351-358 IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Insurance status affects survival for patients with rectal cancer, but a substantial proportion of the difference in survival can be corrected if standard-of-care treatment is given. Every effort should be made to ensure that uninsured or publically insured patients receive standard-of-care treatment with as little delay as possible to improve patient outcomes.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Survival Curves
The Kaplan-Meier estimator is the most common method for constructing survival curves. This...

