Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

26.1K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
26.1K
Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions01:29

Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions

176
Aligning actions are communicative strategies individuals employ to maintain social harmony and preserve personal identity in the face of potential disruptions to social norms. These actions are particularly important in managing social impressions when one's behavior might be seen as inappropriate, incompetent, or morally questionable.Types of Aligning ActionsThe three principal types of aligning actions are disclaimers, accounts, and apologies.DisclaimersDisclaimers are preventive; they are...
176
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

66.7K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
66.7K
The Scientific Method03:50

The Scientific Method

70.2K
Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion. 
70.2K
The Stanford Prison Experiment03:20

The Stanford Prison Experiment

24.9K
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
24.9K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

510
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
510

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ethics and Brain Death in Pediatrics: Recent Controversy and Practical Suggestions.

Journal of pediatric intensive care·2019
Same author

Terms and Conditions May Apply (But Have Little to Do With Ethics).

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2017
Same author

Practical and ethical considerations for using social media in community consultation and public disclosure activities.

Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine·2014
Same author

Investigative bioethics.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2014
Same author

Single-site community consultation for emergency research in a community hospital setting.

Prehospital emergency care·2014
Same author

Randomized clinical trials--removing obstacles.

The New England journal of medicine·2013

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 7, 2026

A Procedure to Study Stress-Induced Relapse of Heroin Seeking after Punishment-Imposed Abstinence
08:05

A Procedure to Study Stress-Induced Relapse of Heroin Seeking after Punishment-Imposed Abstinence

Published on: March 23, 2022

3.1K

Life After Research Misconduct.

Kyle L Galbraith1,2

  • 11 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA.

Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics : JERHRE
|February 22, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Many scientists found guilty of research misconduct continue their careers, with nearly half showing research activity post-sanction. These researchers have secured over $123 million in federal funding, highlighting a trend of second chances in science.

Keywords:
administrative actionspost-misconduct careersresearch integrityresearch misconductresponsible conduct of research

More Related Videos

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research
07:48

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research

Published on: November 26, 2015

10.4K
Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community
08:53

Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community

Published on: May 31, 2019

5.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 7, 2026

A Procedure to Study Stress-Induced Relapse of Heroin Seeking after Punishment-Imposed Abstinence
08:05

A Procedure to Study Stress-Induced Relapse of Heroin Seeking after Punishment-Imposed Abstinence

Published on: March 23, 2022

3.1K
Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research
07:48

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research

Published on: November 26, 2015

10.4K
Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community
08:53

Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community

Published on: May 31, 2019

5.9K

Area of Science:

  • Scientific Ethics
  • Research Integrity
  • Academic Careers

Background:

  • Research misconduct poses a significant threat to scientific integrity and community trust.
  • Scientists found guilty often face professional stigma and corrective actions.
  • Systematic data on the post-misconduct careers of researchers is limited.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the prevalence of continued research activities among scientists who have committed misconduct.
  • To quantify the extent of post-misconduct research output and federal funding received by these individuals.

Main Methods:

  • A review of 284 researchers identified through Office of Research Integrity (ORI) case summaries.
  • Systematic search of public databases and online resources for post-misconduct publications and federal research support.
  • Analysis of career trajectories and financial support post-ORI corrective actions.

Main Results:

  • Indicators of post-misconduct research activities were found for 134 (47.18%) of the 284 researchers studied.
  • These researchers collectively received over US$123 million in federal research funding after their misconduct sanctions.
  • The findings suggest that many scientists continue active research careers after facing misconduct allegations and corrective actions.

Conclusions:

  • A substantial proportion of researchers found guilty of misconduct continue to engage in research and secure funding.
  • The study indicates a tendency for the scientific community to offer second chances to researchers who have violated ethical standards.
  • Further research is needed to explore the long-term implications of these findings on research integrity and public trust.