Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 7, 2026

05:22
Iris Fixation via External Pentagram Suturing
Published on: May 5, 2022
1.9K
Patient satisfaction and vision improvement after multiple surgery for recurrent retinal detachment
1"Citt di Pomezia" Polyclinic, Operative Unit of Ophthalmology, Roma - Italy.
European Journal of Ophthalmology
|February 22, 2017
Summary
Patients with recurrent retinal detachment (RRD) and proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) reported high satisfaction and subjective visual improvement after multiple surgeries. Despite poor outcomes, many found the operations worthwhile and information accurate.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Retinal Surgery
- Patient-Reported Outcomes
Background:
- Recurrent retinal detachment (RRD) with proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) often requires multiple surgical interventions.
- Assessing patient satisfaction and functional status is crucial for evaluating treatment outcomes in complex cases.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate patient satisfaction and functional status following multiple surgeries for RRD with PVR grade C.
- To correlate patient-reported outcomes with objective measures like visual acuity (VA) and anatomic success.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of patients undergoing pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for RRD with PVR grade C.
- Standardized telephone interviews assessing visual performance and satisfaction.
- Statistical analysis including Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Spearman correlation.
Main Results:
- 62 patients with an average of 2.9 surgeries and 1.45 recurrences were analyzed.
- 40/62 eyes achieved better than 5/400 vision; 14/62 better than 20/200.
- 84% found the operation worthwhile, 61% believed VA improved, and significant subjective improvements were noted in daily activities.
Conclusions:
- High patient satisfaction and subjective functional improvement were observed despite challenging surgical outcomes.
- Accurate and comprehensive patient information is critical for managing expectations.
- Factors beyond VA, like visual field and contrast sensitivity, may influence perceived visual function.

