Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 7, 2026

Fabricating Cotton Analytical Devices
Published on: August 30, 2016
Evaluation of Commercial Milk-Specific Lateral Flow Devices
Rachel C Courtney1, Steve L Taylor, Joe L Baumert1
1Department of Food Science and Technology, Food Allergy Research and Resource Program, Room 279, Food Innovation Center, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 1901 North 21st Street, P.O. Box 886207, Lincoln, Nebraska 68588-6207, USA.
Commercial milk allergen testing using lateral flow devices (LFDs) shows significant variability. Understanding LFD limitations, like overload concentrations and heat-dried residue detection, is crucial for accurate allergen cleaning validation.
Area of Science:
- Food safety
- Analytical chemistry
- Allergen detection
Background:
- Validation of allergen cleaning processes is increasingly critical.
- Lateral flow devices (LFDs) are expanding for allergen detection, but best practices are still evolving.
- Variability in LFD performance necessitates careful evaluation for reliable allergen monitoring.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the performance of commercially available milk-specific LFDs against a general protein identification method.
- To evaluate the detection capabilities of LFDs for various milk proteins and derived ingredients.
- To determine the impact of sample preparation and surface drying methods on allergen detectability.
Main Methods:
- Testing of five milk proteins and seven milk-derived ingredients across multiple concentrations using eight milk-specific LFDs and one general protein kit.
- Analysis of nonfat dry milk (NFDM) at varying concentrations (100-10,000 ppm) to identify false-negative (overload) concentrations.
- Assessment of milk protein residue detectability on stainless steel panels using different drying methods and swab sampling techniques.
Main Results:
- Several LFD kits failed to detect whey proteins or whey-derived ingredients.
- Overload concentrations varied widely among kits, ranging from 100 to 10,000 ppm milk protein.
- Milk protein residues dried with high heat were less detectable than those dried with low heat; residue or swab moistening did not affect sensitivity.
Conclusions:
- Significant variability exists in the performance of milk-specific LFDs, impacting their reliability for allergen cleaning validation.
- Understanding the dynamic range and limitations, such as hook effects and residue drying conditions, is essential for accurate LFD use.
- Further research into standardized LFD protocols and performance evaluation is needed for robust allergen control in food processing environments.
More Related Videos
10:10Development of a Lateral Flow Immunochromatographic Strip for Rapid and Quantitative Detection of Small Molecule Compounds
Published on: November 13, 2021
08:01Detection of Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis in Haematological Malignancy Patients by using Lateral-flow Technology
Published on: March 22, 2012