Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cognitive Learning01:21

Cognitive Learning

1.5K
Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
1.5K
Normal and Tangetial Components: Problem Solving01:24

Normal and Tangetial Components: Problem Solving

645
Consider a man with a mass of 70 kg seated in a chair connected to a pin support through a member BC. If the man maintains an upright position, the task is to determine the horizontal and vertical reactions of the chair on the man when the member makes a 45° angle with the horizontal. At this moment, the man has a speed of 5 m/s, increasing at a rate of 1 m/s².
645
Problem-Solving01:29

Problem-Solving

582
Effective problem-solving consists of two steps: 1. identifying the problem and 2. selecting the appropriate problem-solving strategy (i.e., a plan of action used to find a solution). Humans use four problem-solving strategies:
582
Friction: Problem Solving01:21

Friction: Problem Solving

567
Friction is an essential force that influences the motion of objects in daily life. Depending on the situation, it can be either beneficial or problematic. Consider a bus with a mass of three megagrams and its center of mass at a specific point, moving along a banked road at a constant speed. The coefficient of static friction between the tires and the road is 0.5. Find the maximum angle of the banked road at which the bus would not slip or tip.
Initially, a visual representation of the...
567
Impact: Problem Solving01:26

Impact: Problem Solving

488
In an experiment conducted during a Mars mission, a rover propels a projectile with an initial velocity, and the projectile rebounds after colliding with the Martian surface. To ascertain the maximum height attained by the projectile after this collision, the known restitution coefficient and acceleration due to gravity are employed.
By designating the launch point as the origin and utilizing kinematic equations, the vertical component of the projectile's velocity at the point of impact is...
488
Theorems of Pappus and Guldinus: Problem Solving01:12

Theorems of Pappus and Guldinus: Problem Solving

1.1K
Pappus and Guldinus's theorems are powerful mathematical principles that are used for finding the surface area and volume of composite shapes. For example, consider a cylindrical storage tank with a conical top. Finding the surface area or volume can be challenging for such complex shapes. These theorems are particularly useful in calculating the volume and surface area of such systems. Here, the cylindrical storage tank with a conical top can be broken down into two simple shapes: a...
1.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Results from Reindl <i>et al</i>. (2025) support rather than challenge the sequence hypothesis.

Royal Society open science·2025
Same author

No model-based learning with a sequence bottleneck: response to Jacobs et al.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2025
Same author

Sequences and animal intelligence.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2025
Same author

Model-based animal cognition slips through the sequence bottleneck.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2025
Same author

A sequence bottleneck for animal intelligence and language?

Trends in cognitive sciences·2024
Same author

The refinement paradox and cumulative cultural evolution: Complex products of collective improvement favor conformist outcomes, blind copying, and hyper-credulity.

PLoS computational biology·2024
Same journal

Characterizing facilitators and barriers to Hypoglycemic Confidence among patients with diabetes: a qualitative descriptive study.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

Psychometric evaluation and refinement of the 7DHW questionnaire for the German population.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

Editorial: Ethical leadership and workplace equity: mediating and moderating mechanisms in emotional labor and well-being.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

How organizational support promotes teacher professional recognition: a perspective on teachers' autonomous learning and teaching abilities.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

From "performance competition arena" to "psychological exemption zone": psychological safety mechanisms in reverse mobility.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

General and sport-specific mental toughness in university students: associations with personality traits and physical activity.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 7, 2026

Behavioral Assessment of Manual Dexterity in Non-Human Primates
16:00

Behavioral Assessment of Manual Dexterity in Non-Human Primates

Published on: November 11, 2011

23.2K

Time Does Not Help Orangutans Pongo abelii Solve Physical Problems.

Johan Lind1, Sofie Lönnberg2, Tomas Persson3

  • 1Centre for the Study of Cultural Evolution, Stockholm UniversityStockholm, Sweden; Department of Zoology, Stockholm UniversityStockholm, Sweden.

Frontiers in Psychology
|February 23, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Researchers tested if orangutans improve decision-making with more processing time. Findings indicate that additional time did not enhance orangutan performance in this cognitive task, suggesting complex reasoning mechanisms may not rely solely on processing duration.

Keywords:
animal cognitionintelligencemethodologyorangutansreasoningthinking

More Related Videos

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.4K
The Use of the Puzzle Box as a Means of Assessing the Efficacy of Environmental Enrichment
06:50

The Use of the Puzzle Box as a Means of Assessing the Efficacy of Environmental Enrichment

Published on: December 29, 2014

12.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 7, 2026

Behavioral Assessment of Manual Dexterity in Non-Human Primates
16:00

Behavioral Assessment of Manual Dexterity in Non-Human Primates

Published on: November 11, 2011

23.2K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.4K
The Use of the Puzzle Box as a Means of Assessing the Efficacy of Environmental Enrichment
06:50

The Use of the Puzzle Box as a Means of Assessing the Efficacy of Environmental Enrichment

Published on: December 29, 2014

12.5K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Animal Behavior
  • Primatology

Background:

  • Investigating animal intelligence and cognition presents challenges, particularly in identifying the mechanisms behind reasoning.
  • Human skill acquisition suggests that complex problem-solving, including reasoning, can be a multi-step, time-consuming process.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and test a methodology for assessing reasoning mechanisms in non-human animals.
  • To determine if allowing extended processing time improves decision-making performance in orangutans.

Main Methods:

  • A two-choice experiment was designed for two Sumatran orangutans (Pongo abelii).
  • Orangutan performance was compared between conditions with immediate decision-making and conditions allowing extra processing time.

Main Results:

  • Orangutan performance in the two-choice experiment was not significantly affected by the amount of time allowed for information processing before making a decision.
  • This suggests that increased time alone does not necessarily improve performance on this specific cognitive task.

Conclusions:

  • The study presents a novel methodology for empirical investigation of reasoning mechanisms in non-human animals.
  • Findings indicate that the role of processing time in animal decision-making may be more nuanced than initially hypothesized, prompting further research into cognitive processes.