Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 7, 2026

Use of a Psychophysiological Script-driven Imagery Experiment to Study Trauma-related Dissociation in Borderline Personality Disorder
Published on: March 8, 2018
Seeking Legitimacy for DSM-5: The Bereavement Exception as an Example of Failed Process
James E Sabin1, Norman Daniels2
1Clinical professor in the Departments of Population Medicine and Psychiatry at Harvard Medical School in Boston and director of the ethics program at Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, a not-for-profit regional health services program, and a fellow of the Hastings Center and a member of the American Medical Association Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs.
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) removed the bereavement exclusion for major depression, sparking controversy. Applying the "accountability for reasonableness" framework could improve ethical and policy decisions in mental health.
Area of Science:
- Psychiatry
- Mental Health Policy
- Medical Ethics
Background:
- The 2013 publication of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition (DSM-5) by the American Psychiatric Association (APA) faced significant criticism.
- A primary point of contention was the removal of the "bereavement exclusion" criterion for diagnosing major depressive disorder.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the legitimacy of the APA's decision-making process regarding the DSM-5's bereavement exclusion.
- To explore the utility of the "accountability for reasonableness" framework in resolving ethical and public policy conflicts within mental health.
Main Methods:
- Critical analysis of the APA's authority in scientific versus ethical domains.
- Application of the "accountability for reasonableness" framework to the DSM-5 bereavement exclusion controversy.
Main Results:
- The APA possesses scientific authority but lacks legitimacy in resolving ethical and public policy issues.
- The "accountability for reasonableness" framework offers a structured approach to enhance the legitimacy of health policy decisions.
Conclusions:
- The DSM-5's handling of the bereavement exclusion highlights the need for a more robust ethical and policy-making process.
- Adopting frameworks like "accountability for reasonableness" can lead to more equitable and publicly acceptable resolutions in psychiatric nosology and policy.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)
Bonanno's Theory of Grieving
Resilience
Kubler Ross's Stages of Dying
In denial, individuals reject the reality of their condition, often thinking, "This isn't true; I feel fine," as a way to protect themselves from...
Dissociative Amnesia
Dissociative Identity Disorder
Depressive Disorders: Etiology
Biological Factors in Depression
Biological predispositions significantly influence the risk of developing depressive disorders. Genetic studies highlight the role of variations in the serotonin transporter...

