Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effect of coded steatotic liver disease on outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in non-diabetic adults: insights from a multicenter real-world cohort.

BMC cardiovascular disorders·2026
Same author

Notably Off Key: Questioning the Clinical Benefit of Perioperative Immunotherapy for Resectable Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma After KEYNOTE-689.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology·2026
Same author

Radiation-induced remodeling of the T cell landscape in head and neck cancer.

Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII·2026
Same author

Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Heart Failure Hospitalization in a Real-World Cardiometabolic Population.

The American journal of cardiology·2026
Same author

Disproportionate Elevated Troponin T Without Clinical Ischemia: A Diagnostic Challenge in the Emergency Department.

Case reports in medicine·2026
Same author

Sustainability in Smart Health Systems.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 7, 2026

Endoscopic Septoplasty with Limited Two-line Resection: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Septal Deviation
06:13

Endoscopic Septoplasty with Limited Two-line Resection: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Septal Deviation

Published on: June 20, 2018

18.2K

Titanium Mesh Nasal Repair without Nasal Lining.

Joseph Zenga1, Katherine Kao1, Collin Chen1

  • 1Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri.

Facial Plastic Surgery : FPS
|February 23, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Titanium mesh nasal reconstruction without internal lining repair offers shorter operative times for full-thickness defects. However, this technique may be unsuitable for patients receiving radiotherapy due to higher complication risks.

More Related Videos

A Standardized Surgical Technique for Tessier Medial Transnasal Canthopexy
06:08

A Standardized Surgical Technique for Tessier Medial Transnasal Canthopexy

Published on: January 23, 2026

154
Rapid Formation and Testing of Self-expanding NiTi Frames with a Small Form Factor Suitable for Minimally Invasive Implants
06:48

Rapid Formation and Testing of Self-expanding NiTi Frames with a Small Form Factor Suitable for Minimally Invasive Implants

Published on: March 7, 2025

846

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 7, 2026

Endoscopic Septoplasty with Limited Two-line Resection: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Septal Deviation
06:13

Endoscopic Septoplasty with Limited Two-line Resection: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Septal Deviation

Published on: June 20, 2018

18.2K
A Standardized Surgical Technique for Tessier Medial Transnasal Canthopexy
06:08

A Standardized Surgical Technique for Tessier Medial Transnasal Canthopexy

Published on: January 23, 2026

154
Rapid Formation and Testing of Self-expanding NiTi Frames with a Small Form Factor Suitable for Minimally Invasive Implants
06:48

Rapid Formation and Testing of Self-expanding NiTi Frames with a Small Form Factor Suitable for Minimally Invasive Implants

Published on: March 7, 2025

846

Area of Science:

  • Plastic and reconstructive surgery
  • Head and neck oncology
  • Biomaterials in medicine

Background:

  • Full-thickness nasal defects present significant reconstructive challenges.
  • Traditional three-layer closure is a common method for nasal reconstruction.
  • Titanium mesh offers an alternative for structural support in complex defects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate outcomes of titanium mesh reconstruction for full-thickness nasal defects.
  • To compare titanium mesh reconstruction without internal lining repair to traditional three-layer closure.
  • To identify factors influencing complication rates in nasal reconstruction.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective cohort study of patients with through-and-through nasal defects (2008-2016).
  • Comparison of titanium mesh reconstruction (n=5) versus traditional three-layer closure (n=11).
  • Analysis of operative time, blood loss, hospital stay, and complication rates.

Main Results:

  • Titanium mesh reconstruction significantly reduced operative time (median 119 vs. 314 minutes).
  • No significant differences in blood loss, hospital stay, or overall complication rates.
  • Complications in titanium mesh group were associated with prior or postoperative radiotherapy.

Conclusions:

  • Titanium mesh reconstruction without internal lining repair is a viable option for full-thickness nasal defects, reducing operative time.
  • This technique may be contraindicated in patients undergoing radiotherapy due to increased complication risks.
  • Further research is needed to optimize reconstructive strategies for irradiated patients.