Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 7, 2026

Effective Analysis of Human Exposure Conditions with Body-worn Dosimeters in the 2.4 GHz Band
Published on: May 2, 2018
Accuracy of two geocoding methods for geographic information system-based exposure assessment in epidemiological
Elodie Faure1, Aurélie M N Danjou1,2, Françoise Clavel-Chapelon3,4,5
1Cancer and Environnent Department, Centre Léon Bérard, 28 rue Laennec, 69373, Lyon, Cedex, 08, France.
This study shows that automatic geocoding methods are feasible for environmental exposure assessment in epidemiological studies, with comparable accuracy. An in-house geocoder offered better control and efficiency for geocoding residential histories.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Epidemiology
- Geographic Information Systems (GIS)
- Spatial Analysis
Background:
- Accurate residential location data is crucial for environmental exposure assessment in epidemiological studies to prevent misclassification bias.
- Geographic Information Systems (GIS) are increasingly used to determine participants' proximity to environmental exposure sources.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the positional accuracy of two automatic geocoding methods against a manual reference method.
- To evaluate geocoding performance for historical residential addresses (1990-2008) in an epidemiological cohort.
Main Methods:
- Geocoded 4,247 historical address records from 1,685 women in the French E3N cohort using two automatic methods (free online service - A, in-house - B) and a manual reference (R).
- Compared positional accuracy based on urban/rural status and time periods (1990-2000, 2001-2008) using Chi Square tests.
- Assessed agreement between automatic methods (A, B) and reference method (R) using Kappa statistics.
Main Results:
- Methods A and B geocoded 81.4% and 84.4% of addresses to the street segment or exact address level, respectively.
- Geocoding accuracy was significantly higher in urban than rural areas (74.4% vs. 10.5%, p < 0.0001).
- Median positional errors were 0.0m (Method A) and 26.5m (Method B), with substantial agreement (Kappa=0.60 for A, 0.61 for B) with the reference method.
Conclusions:
- Automatic geocoding is feasible for historical residential addresses in epidemiological studies, even for residences over 20 years old.
- The accuracy of the two automatic geocoding methods was comparable.
- The in-house geocoder provided better process control and was more time-efficient.
Related Concept Videos
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Introduction to Epidemiology

