Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 7, 2026

Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity
Published on: March 13, 2014
Using environmental heterogeneity to plan for sea-level rise.
Elizabeth A Hunter1, Nathan P Nibbelink1
1Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, 180 E. Green St., Athens, GA, 30602, U.S.A.
Conserving nature's stage (CNS) effectively selects salt marsh conservation sites, with the environmental richness approach outperforming random selection and improving resilience to sea level rise (SLR). This method can guide coastal conservation planning.
Area of Science:
- Ecology
- Conservation Biology
- Climate Change Adaptation
Background:
- Environmental heterogeneity is a key factor in selecting conservation areas for future biodiversity under climate change.
- The conserving nature's stage (CNS) approach assumes environmental features change slower than biological communities.
- The effectiveness of CNS is questioned when environmental features change rapidly, such as in coastal salt marshes experiencing sea level rise (SLR).
Purpose of the Study:
- To test the effectiveness of CNS for salt marsh conservation in coastal Georgia, USA, considering rapid environmental changes due to SLR.
- To evaluate two methods for selecting sites based on environmental heterogeneity: environmental diversity (ED) and environmental richness (ER).
- To assess the performance of selected sites in predicting species diversity, resilience to SLR, and habitat provision for threatened species.
Main Methods:
- Calculated species diversity for 7 bird species in Georgia salt marshes.
- Assessed environmental heterogeneity across six landscape gradients (elevation, salinity, patch area).
- Used ED and ER approaches to select conservation sites and compared their effectiveness against random selection.
Main Results:
- ER-selected sites predicted present-day species diversity better than random sites (up to 8.1% improvement).
- ER-selected sites showed resilience to SLR (1.0% average areal loss by 2050 vs. 0.9% for random sites) and provided better habitat for a threatened species.
- ED-selected sites did not predict species diversity better than random sites and were less resilient to SLR (2.9% average areal loss by 2050).
Conclusions:
- The ER approach within CNS is a viable strategy for salt marsh conservation site selection, demonstrating success in predicting diversity and SLR resilience.
- CNS, particularly the ER method, has potential for other coastal areas impacted by SLR, though performance may vary with geological change magnitude.
- Coastal ecosystems, including low-lying coasts, should be considered in regional conservation strategies using CNS planning.
Related Concept Videos
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Effect of Sea Water on Concrete
Concrete in areas between tide marks,...
Design Example: Maintaining Level of an Embankment
Influence of Earth's Curvature and Atmospheric Refraction on Leveling
Responses to Drought and Flooding
Global Climate Change

