Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 7, 2026

Author Spotlight: Ex Vivo OCT-Based Multimodal Imaging of Human Donor Eyes for Research into Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Published on: May 26, 2023
Three-Dimensional Analysis of Morphologic Changes and Visual Outcomes in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Hyungwoo Lee1, Aerin Jo1, Hyung Chan Kim1
1Department of Ophthalmology, Konkuk University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Purpose:
To investigate the association of three-dimensionally quantified lesions with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in typical neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).
Methods:
We retrospectively analyzed 65 eyes of 61 typical nAMD patients. Lesions at baseline and month 12 were manually delineated in optical coherence tomography. The volume of intraretinal fluid (IRF), subretinal fluid (SRF), subretinal hyperreflective material (SHRM), and pigment epithelial detachment (PED) were measured. In addition, the areas of external limiting membrane (ELM) and ellipsoid zone (EZ) were calculated.
Results:
At baseline, poor baseline BCVA was associated with increased volume of IRF and SHRM and impaired area of ELM (β = 0.34, P = 0.001; β = 0.46, P < 0.001; and β = -0.23, P = 0.03, respectively). At month 12, poor BCVA was associated with increased volume of IRF, reduced intact ELM area, and decreased EZ area (β = 0.24, P = 0.01; β = -0.30, P = 0.02; and β = -0.37, P = 0.004, respectively). Baseline BCVA, volume of IRF, and intact area of ELM were significant predictors for BCVA at month 12 (β = 0.29, P = 0.01; β = 0.30, P = 0.01; and β = -0.28, P = 0.01). Changes of BCVA were associated with changes of SHRM volume, intact EZ area, and ELM area (β = 0.35, P = 0.002; β = -0.28, P = 0.01; and β = -0.22, P = 0.048, respectively). The predictive power of volumetric analysis was higher than that of qualitative analysis (R2 = 0.47 vs. R2 = 0.37). The volume of SRF and fibrovascular PED showed positive and negative effect on visual outcome each, but they were not strong enough to remain in multivariate model.
Conclusions:
Best-corrected visual acuity could be explained by three-dimensional optical coherence tomography morphology to a fair degree. In addition, three-dimensional analysis could predict visual outcomes better than qualitative analysis.
More Related Videos
05:14Author Spotlight: Overcoming Anti-VEGF Resistance Through Advanced Vascular Morphology Assessment in Choroidal Neovascularization
Published on: August 11, 2023
08:54Author Spotlight: Understanding Age-Related Macular Degeneration Pathophysiology with QAF Workflow
Published on: May 26, 2023