Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 25, 2026

Characterizing Exon Skipping Efficiency in DMD Patient Samples in Clinical Trials of Antisense Oligonucleotides
Published on: May 7, 2020
Clinical trials from the patient perspective: survey in an online patient community
Pronabesh DasMahapatra1, Priya Raja2, Jeremy Gilbert2
1PatientsLikeMe Inc, 155 Second Street, Cambridge, MA, 02141, USA. pdasmahapatra@patientslikeme.com.
Background:
Developing new medicines relies on the successful conduct of clinical trials. As trial protocols become more arduous, it becomes harder to recruit and retain patient volunteers, although recent efforts such as OMERACT and I-SPY2 show that partnering with patients can be beneficial. We sought to describe drivers and barriers to trial participation, as well as condition-specific trial preferences.
Methods:
An online survey was fielded via the patient-powered research network PatientsLikeMe to 1,621 members living with nine selected chronic health conditions. Questions included demographics, trial experience, reasons for non-participation, questions relating to aspects of trial design, and an adaptation of the Net Promoter Score (NPS) for trial satisfaction.
Results:
Mean age of respondents was 55 years; most patients were white (93%), female (67%), and living in the United States (72%). Primary conditions were MS (21%), Parkinson's (20%), fibromyalgia (15%), ALS (10%), type 2 diabetes (10%), rheumatoid arthritis (RA, 8%), epilepsy (8%), major depressive disorder (MDD, 5%) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE, 3%). Most patients had not discussed a trial with their physician and only 21% had ever enrolled, with rates highest in ALS (36%), Parkinson's disease (36%) and MS (20%) and lowest among SLE (9%), MDD (11%) and Fibromyalgia (11%). Common reasons for non-participation were eligibility criteria, inconvenience of travel and concerns about side effects. NPS suggested that many patients were unsatisfied; patients with lupus, epilepsy, RA, and fibromyalgia reported negative scores, i.e. they would dissuade other patients like them from taking part in trials. The most important considerations in trial participation were the opportunity to improve one's own health and that of others, the reputation of the institution, and having medical bills covered in case of injury. Least important were remuneration and possibility of receiving a placebo. ALS patients were more willing to tolerate undesirable aspects of trials.
Conclusions:
Most patients are willing to enroll yet very few are invited. When they do, trial participation is often burdensome, but patients are willing to help improve their design. Researchers should let patients help design better trials to overcome recruitment and retention issues and hasten the development of new medicines.
Insights
Patient willingness to participate in clinical trials is high, but recruitment and retention are hindered by burdensome protocols. Involving patients in trial design can improve participation and accelerate new medicine development.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Trial Design
- Patient Engagement
- Drug Development
Background:
- Developing new medicines depends on successful clinical trials.
- Increasingly arduous trial protocols create challenges in patient recruitment and retention.
- Patient-partnered initiatives demonstrate potential benefits for trial conduct.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify key drivers and barriers influencing patient participation in clinical trials.
- To understand patient-specific preferences regarding clinical trial design.
- To assess patient satisfaction with current trial participation experiences.
Main Methods:
- An online survey was distributed to 1,621 members of the PatientsLikeMe research network.
- The survey included questions on demographics, prior trial experience, reasons for non-participation, and trial design preferences.
- Patient satisfaction was measured using an adapted Net Promoter Score (NPS).
Main Results:
- Most respondents (55 years average age, 93% White, 67% Female, 72% US-based) had not discussed trials with physicians; only 21% had enrolled.
- Common barriers included eligibility criteria, travel inconvenience, and side effect concerns.
- Patients with certain conditions (lupus, epilepsy, RA, fibromyalgia) reported negative NPS scores, indicating dissatisfaction.
Conclusions:
- A significant gap exists between patient willingness to enroll and actual invitation rates.
- Despite burdens, patients are motivated to improve trial design and contribute to medical advancement.
- Collaborative patient-centered trial design is crucial for overcoming recruitment/retention issues and expediting new drug development.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Surveys
Changes in Skin Color: Clinical Perspectives
Albinism
Albinism is a genetic disorder that affects (completely or partially) the coloring of skin, hair, and eyes. The defect is primarily...
Statistical Software for Data Analysis and Clinical Trials
Patient-centered Care

