Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 7, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Analysis of Factors Affecting Successful Clinical Trial Enrollment in the Context of Three Prospective, Randomized,
Jennifer K Logan1, Chad Tang1, Zhongxing Liao1
1Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Purpose:
Challenges can arise when attempting to maximize patient enrollment in clinical trials. There have been limited studies focusing on the barriers to enrollment and the efficacy of alternative study design to improve accrual. We analyzed barriers to clinical trial enrollment, particularly the influence of timing, in context of three prospective, randomized oncology trials where one arm was considered more aggressive than the other.
Methods And Materials:
From June 2011 to March 2015, patients who were enrolled on 3 prospective institutional protocols (an oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer [NSCLC] trial and 2 proton vs intensity modulated radiation therapy trials in NSCLC and esophageal cancer) were screened for protocol eligibility. Eligible candidates were approached about trial participation, and patient characteristics (age, sex, T/N categorization) were recorded along with details surrounding trial presentation (appointment number). Fisher's exact test, Student's t tests, and multivariate analysis were performed to assess differences between enrolled and refusal patients.
Results:
A total of 309 eligible patients were approached about trial enrollment. The enrollment success rate during this time span was 52% (n=160 patients). Enrolled patients were more likely to be presented trial information at an earlier appointment (oligometastatic protocol: 5 vs 3 appointments [P<.001]; NSCLC protocol: 4 vs 3 appointments [P=.0018]; esophageal protocol: 3 vs 2 appointments [P=.0086]). No other factors or patient characteristics significantly affected enrollment success rate.
Conclusion:
Improvement in enrollment rates for randomized control trials is possible, even in difficult accrual settings. Earlier presentation of trial information to patients is the most influential factor for success and may help overcome accrual barriers without compromising trial design.
Insights
Early trial information presentation significantly boosts patient enrollment in oncology clinical trials. This strategy improves accrual rates without altering study design, even in challenging settings.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Clinical Trials
- Radiation Therapy
Background:
- Maximizing patient enrollment in clinical trials presents significant challenges.
- Limited research exists on enrollment barriers and alternative study designs to improve patient accrual.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze barriers to clinical trial enrollment, focusing on the influence of timing.
- To evaluate the efficacy of early trial information presentation in improving accrual rates for oncology trials.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of patient enrollment data from three prospective, randomized oncology trials (NSCLC, esophageal cancer).
- Screening of eligible patients, recording patient characteristics, and trial presentation timing (appointment number).
- Statistical analysis including Fisher's exact test, Student's t tests, and multivariate analysis to compare enrolled vs. refusal patients.
Main Results:
- A 52% enrollment success rate was observed among 309 eligible patients approached.
- Earlier presentation of trial information was the most significant factor influencing enrollment success across all three protocols.
- No other patient characteristics or factors significantly impacted enrollment rates.
Conclusions:
- Enrollment rates in randomized control trials can be improved, even in difficult accrual settings.
- Presenting trial information earlier to patients is a key factor for successful accrual.
- This strategy can overcome enrollment barriers without compromising the integrity of trial design.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Factors Affecting Drug Response: Overview
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Blinding

