Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 7, 2026

A Model of Reverse Vascular Remodeling in Pulmonary Hypertension Due to Left Heart Disease by Aortic Debanding in Rats
Published on: March 1, 2022
Vascular Remodelling in Well-controlled Hypertensive Patients: The Challenge of Residual Risk Management
Massimo Puato1, Chiara Nardin1, Marta Zanon1
1Department of Medicine - DIMED, University of Padova, Medicina Interna I. , Ospedale Ca' Foncello, Via Ospedale 1, 31100 Treviso.
Insights
Residual cardiovascular risk (RCVR) persists in hypertensive patients even with controlled blood pressure (BP). Optimal BP control alone is insufficient to prevent vascular damage, necessitating personalized risk assessment and treatment strategies.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Hypertension Management
- Vascular Biology
Background:
- Residual cardiovascular risk (RCVR) is a significant concern in hypertension management.
- Even with controlled blood pressure (BP), hypertensive patients face elevated cardiovascular (CV) risk compared to normotensive individuals.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review clinical evidence on RCVR determinants and impact in hypertension.
- To focus on RCVR's role in the progression of vascular damage.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of clinical studies on hypertension and RCVR.
- Analysis of factors contributing to RCVR and vascular damage progression.
Main Results:
- RCVR is a major challenge beyond achieving BP targets.
- "Pseudo-normalization" of BP does not eliminate the risk of pro-atherogenic arterial remodeling.
- Early and sustained BP control is crucial to prevent target organ damage.
Conclusions:
- Further research is needed on interventions targeting specific BP profiles and inflammation for RCVR.
- Personalized CV risk phenotyping and tailored pharmacological approaches are key to reducing vascular damage and RCVR.
Background:
Residual cardiovascular risk (RCVR) is an emerging issue in the clinical and therapeutic management of patients affected by hypertension. In fact, a number of clinical studies showed that even in case of optimal blood pressure (BP) control, the hypertensive patients still carry a sizeable increase in the CV risk as compared to normotensive individuals.
Methods:
We will review the clinical evidence about the determinants and the impact of RCVR on hypertension, with a specific focus on the progression of vascular damage.
Results:
The presence of RCVR in hypertensive patients is a significant phenomenon which challenges our clinical effort far beyond the reaching of BP targets. Although major determinants of RCVR are still undefined, there is a clear indication about the importance of an early and sustained control of BP values, so as to prevent the onset of target organ damage. In fact, our data and findings from the literature indicate that the "pseudo-normalization" of BP is not sufficient to abolish the risk of pro-atherogenic remodeling of arterial vessels.
Conclusion:
Additional studies are needed to establish whether the intervention on specific BP profiles and inflammatory mechanisms can have some clinical relevance in the management of RCVR. In the meanwhile, the precise phenotyping of the CV risk profile of each patient, coupled with a tailored pharmacological approach, represents the most effective strategy to hinder the progression of vascular damage and reduce the RCVR.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Hypertension and Regulation of Blood Pressure
Hypertension II: Pathophysiology
Antihypertensive Drugs: Vasodilators
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Hypertension V: Nursing Management

