Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 7, 2026

Novel Diagnostics in Revision Arthroplasty: Implant Sonication and Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction
Published on: December 3, 2017
Prevention of joint damage in hemophilic children with early prophylaxis
W Kreuz1, C Escuriola Ettingshausen1, M Funk1
1Zentrum der Kinderheilkunde und Jugendmedizin, Klinik III, Klinikum der Johann Wolfgang Goethe Universität, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Insights
Starting prophylactic treatment early in life significantly reduces joint damage in patients with haemophilia A and B. Early intervention before joint bleeds occur is crucial for preventing irreversible haemophilic arthropathy.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedics
- Hematology
- Pediatrics
Background:
- Severe and moderate hemophilia A and B can lead to significant joint damage (hemophilic arthropathy).
- Long-term prophylactic treatment with factor concentrates is a standard care approach.
- The optimal timing for initiating prophylaxis and its impact on joint outcomes require further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the radiological and orthopaedic outcomes in severe and moderate hemophilia A and B patients undergoing long-term prophylactic treatment.
- To evaluate the influence of the age of onset of prophylaxis and the number of prior joint bleedings on joint health.
- To determine the effectiveness of prophylaxis in preventing or halting the progression of hemophilic arthropathy.
Main Methods:
- Prospective study of 21 patients with severe/moderate hemophilia A and B receiving prophylaxis (3.1-16.1 years).
- Patients grouped by age of prophylaxis initiation: Group I (0-2 years), Group II (3-6 years), Group III (>6 years).
- Radiological and orthopaedic joint assessments (WFH scores) and joint bleeding history recorded.
Main Results:
- Group I (early prophylaxis) showed minimal joint damage (7/8 patients with scores 0-1) after median 11.25 years.
- Group II (mid-onset prophylaxis) experienced worsening joint scores despite treatment, indicating progressive damage.
- Group III (late-onset prophylaxis) presented with significant pre-existing joint damage that worsened despite prophylaxis, especially in those with >6 prior bleeds.
Conclusions:
- Early initiation of prophylaxis (before or around the first joint bleed) is critical for preventing irreversible joint damage in hemophilia.
- Even with prophylaxis, significant joint damage can progress if initiated late or after multiple prior bleeds.
- Preventative strategies must focus on very early intervention to preserve joint function in hemophilia patients.
Abstract:
Radiological and orthopaedic outcome in severe and moderate haemophilia A and B patients undergoing long-term prophylactic treatment were prospectively investigated focusing on the age of onset of prophylaxis and the number of joint bleedings prior to treatment. We report on 21 patients with severe and moderate haemophilia A and B receiving prophylactic treatment of between 3.1 and 16.1 years duration. Three patient groups were evaluated according to the age at onset of prophylaxis. In group I (n = 8) prophylactic treatment was initiated in the first 2 years of life. Patients of group II (n = 6) received prophylaxis at the age of 3-6 years. Late-onset or secondary prophylactic treatment was started at the age of 6 years and above in 7 patients (group III). All patients received virus-inactivated F VIII or F IX concentrates at dosages of 30-40 IU, in some cases up to 50 IU/kg body weight i. v. three times per week for those with haemophilia A and twice per week for those with haemophilia B. Elbow, knee and ankle joints were investigated at 3-4 yearly intervals according to the radiological and orthopaedic scores recommended by the World Federation of Haemophilia (WFH). The total number of joint bleedings before and after start of prophylaxis were recorded in all patients. In group I 7 out of 8 patients had unaffected joints with constant radiological and orthopaedic scores of zero or 1, after a median of 11.25 years of prophylactic treatment. One patient in this group demonstrated mild radiological alterations (score 4). Patients of group II showed neither radiological nor orthopaedic alterations at study entry. Worsening joint scores could be detected despite ongoing prophylaxis after the 3-year interval (median orthopaedic score 4, median radiological score 8). Treatment group III already showed considerable joint damage at study entry with a median radiological score of 11 (0-33) and a median orthopaedic score of 4 (0-11). Despite prophylactic treatment both, orthopaedic (median 8, range 2-12) and radiological scores (median 19.5, range 2-47) deteriorated after 3 years. Prior to onset of prophylaxis no or only one joint bleeding occurred in treatment group I. In group II, a median of 6 joint bleeds (range 1-8) were reported before prophylaxis was started. Patients of group III usually experienced a median of more than 10 joint haemorrhages (range 6-10 or more). Under prophylactic treatment the number of joint bleedings decreased significantly in groups II and III. However, radiological and orthopaedic scores increased as a sign of progressing osteoarthropathic alterations in patients reporting more than 6 joint haemorrhages before onset of prophylaxis whereas no joint alterations could be assessed in patients with no or only one joint bleeding episode prior to prophylaxis. Even a small number of joint bleedings seems to cause irreversible osteoarthropathic alterations leading to haemophilic arthropathy. Once apparent, further progression of joint damage could not be arrested despite of prophylactic treatment (group II and III). In order to prevent haemophilic arthropathy, effective prophylaxis should be started before or at least after the first joint bleeding in severe haemophilia A and B.
Related Concept Videos
Rheumatic Heart Disease III: Medical Management
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Rheumatic Heart Disease IV: Nursing Management
Rheumatic Heart Disease I: Introduction
Rh Blood Group
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care

