Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 6, 2026

Closure of a Patent Foramen Ovale PFO: An Intervention Sequence
Published on: December 23, 2022
Perimembranous Ventricular Septal Defect Device Closure: Choosing Between Amplatzer Duct Occluder I and II
Amal El-Sisi1, R Sobhy2, V Jaccoub3
1Pediatric Cardiology Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Cairo University Children Hospital (Abou El Reesh Japanese Hospital), Aly Ibrahim Street, Giza, Egypt. elsisi96@yahoo.com.
Amplatzer duct occluders (ADO) I and II effectively close perimembranous ventricular septal defects (pmVSDs). Transthoracic echocardiography can guide the choice between ADOI and ADOII for cost-effective treatment in low-resource settings.
Area of Science:
- Interventional Cardiology
- Pediatric Cardiology
- Medical Device Technology
Background:
- Transcatheter closure is a standard treatment for perimembranous ventricular septal defects (pmVSDs).
- Amplatzer duct occluders (ADO) I and II are increasingly used off-label for pmVSD closure due to their cost-effectiveness, particularly in developing countries.
- Standard Amplatzer VSD occluders are more expensive than ADO devices.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of using ADO I and ADO II devices for transcatheter closure of symptomatic, hemodynamically significant pmVSDs.
- To determine if transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) findings can reliably predetermine the choice between ADOI and ADOII devices.
- To assess the cost-effectiveness of using ADO devices in low-budget programs.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis of 30 patients with pmVSDs who underwent transcatheter closure using ADO I or ADO II devices between March 2013 and November 2014.
- Device selection (ADOI vs. ADOII) was guided by pre-procedural transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) findings.
- Echocardiographic and angiographic measurements of VSD size, fluoroscopy time, and patient demographics were recorded. Follow-up included clinical assessment and echocardiography.
Main Results:
- Both ADOI and ADOII devices demonstrated high closure rates (94% at last follow-up) and were safe, with no reported complications like heart block.
- ADOII use was limited to VSDs ≤6 mm and without large aneurysms, while ADOI was used in larger defects.
- The pre-determined device choice based on TTE was accurate in 84% of cases, with ADOI patients having significantly larger VSDs and longer fluoroscopy times.
Conclusions:
- Transcatheter closure of pmVSDs using ADO I and ADO II devices is safe and effective.
- ADOII is suitable for smaller pmVSDs, whereas ADOI is preferred for larger defects.
- Pre-procedural TTE assessment is a valuable tool for selecting the appropriate ADO device, facilitating cost-effective treatment in resource-limited settings.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management

