Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview01:08

Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview

1.6K
In bromoethane, the three methyl protons are coupled to the two methylene protons that are three bonds away. In accordance with the n+1 rule, the signal from the methyl protons is split into three peaks with 1:2:1 relative intensities. The methylene protons appear as a quartet, with the relative intensities of 1:3:3:1.
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
1.6K
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling01:17

Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling

1.5K
Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
1.5K
Magnetic Field due to Moving Charges01:23

Magnetic Field due to Moving Charges

12.0K
A stationary charge creates and interacts with the electric field, while a moving charge creates a magnetic field.
Consider a point charge moving with a constant velocity. Like the electric field, the magnetic field at any point is directly proportional to the magnitude of the charge and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between the source point and the field point. However, unlike the electric field, the magnetic field is always perpendicular to the plane containing the line...
12.0K
Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Spin State Overview01:03

Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Spin State Overview

2.1K
NMR-active nuclei have energy levels called 'spin states' that are associated with the orientations of their nuclear magnetic moments. In the absence of a magnetic field, the nuclear magnetic moments are randomly oriented, and the spin states are degenerate. When an external magnetic field is applied, the spin states have only 2 + 1 orientations available to them. A proton with = ½ has two available orientations. Similarly, for a quadrupolar nucleus with a nuclear spin value of one, the...
2.1K
Magnetic Force Between Two Parallel Currents01:13

Magnetic Force Between Two Parallel Currents

4.7K
Two long, straight, and parallel current-carrying conductors exert a force of equal magnitude on one another. The direction of the force depends on the current direction in the conductors.
The force exerted by the magnetic field due to the first conductor over a finite length of the second conductor is given as the product of the current in the second conductor and  the vector product of the length vector along the current element and the field due to the first conductor. According to the...
4.7K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)01:20

Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)

1.9K
Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
1.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Measuring the variability of local characteristics in complex networks: Empirical and analytical analysis.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2023
Same author

Molecular Pathway Activation Markers Are Associated with Efficacy of Trastuzumab Therapy in Metastatic HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Better than Individual Gene Expression Levels.

Biochemistry. Biokhimiia·2020
Same author

Erratum: Magnetic Moment Manipulation by a Josephson Current [Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 017001 (2009)].

Physical review letters·2019
Same author

Theory of Magnetic Domain Phases in Ferromagnetic Superconductors.

Physical review letters·2019
Same author

Temperature Controlled Fulde-Ferrell-Larkin-Ovchinnikov Instability in Superconductor-Ferromagnet Hybrids.

Physical review letters·2018
Same author

Ventricular remodelling in rabbits with sustained high-fat diet.

Acta physiologica (Oxford, England)·2013

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 6, 2026

Scalable Quantum Integrated Circuits on Superconducting Two-Dimensional Electron Gas Platform
05:39

Scalable Quantum Integrated Circuits on Superconducting Two-Dimensional Electron Gas Platform

Published on: August 2, 2019

10.4K

Spontaneous Currents in Superconducting Systems with Strong Spin-Orbit Coupling.

S Mironov1, A Buzdin2

  • 1Institute for Physics of Microstructures, Russian Academy of Sciences, 603950 Nizhny Novgorod, GSP-105, Russia.

Physical Review Letters
|March 4, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Rashba spin-orbit coupling at superconductor-ferromagnet interfaces generates spontaneous currents. These currents create magnetic fields and influence critical field behavior, potentially forming Abrikosov vortices.

More Related Videos

Scanning SQUID Study of Vortex Manipulation by Local Contact
06:53

Scanning SQUID Study of Vortex Manipulation by Local Contact

Published on: February 1, 2017

7.4K
Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser
09:00

Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser

Published on: June 28, 2018

10.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 6, 2026

Scalable Quantum Integrated Circuits on Superconducting Two-Dimensional Electron Gas Platform
05:39

Scalable Quantum Integrated Circuits on Superconducting Two-Dimensional Electron Gas Platform

Published on: August 2, 2019

10.4K
Scanning SQUID Study of Vortex Manipulation by Local Contact
06:53

Scanning SQUID Study of Vortex Manipulation by Local Contact

Published on: February 1, 2017

7.4K
Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser
09:00

Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser

Published on: June 28, 2018

10.6K

Area of Science:

  • Condensed matter physics
  • Spintronics
  • Superconductivity

Background:

  • Rashba spin-orbit coupling is crucial in spintronic devices.
  • The interplay between superconductivity and ferromagnetism is key to novel electronic phenomena.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effects of Rashba spin-orbit coupling at superconductor-ferromagnet interfaces.
  • To explore the resulting spontaneous currents and their magnetic consequences.

Main Methods:

  • Theoretical analysis of spin-orbit coupling effects.
  • Modeling of current generation and magnetic field induction.

Main Results:

  • Spontaneous currents arise in the atomic layer near the interface.
  • These currents induce magnetic fields and alter critical field properties.
  • Potential for spontaneous Abrikosov vortex generation is identified.

Conclusions:

  • Rashba spin-orbit coupling in superconductor-ferromagnet heterostructures leads to unique current-carrying states.
  • These states have significant implications for magnetic field generation and vortex dynamics.