Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Genome Copying Errors02:46

Genome Copying Errors

5.3K
DNA replication is a well-evolved process that copies millions of base pairs with high fidelity during each cell division. Occasionally a wrong base or a long stretch of wrong bases may get added to the daughter strands. If the errors are left unchecked, cells might accumulate several mutations that might endanger their  survival. Therefore, the copying errors are checked and repaired at three levels.
5.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Considerations on the risk assessment of genetically modified plants containing transformation events stacked by conventional crossing.

EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority·2026
Same author

Assessment of genetically modified soybean FG72 for renewal authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (dossier GMFF-2025-33580).

EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority·2026
Same author

Turnip mosaic virus utilizes the lipid droplet biogenesis machinery to facilitate its propagation in plants.

The New phytologist·2026
Same author

Risk assessment of new sequencing information on GM maize event DAS-59122-7.

EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority·2026
Same author

Scientific Opinion on an application by Dow AgroSciences (EFSA-GMO-NL-2013-116) for placing on the market of genetically modified insect-resistant soybean DAS-81419-2 for food and feed uses, import and processing under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003.

EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority·2026
Same author

Scientific Opinion on an application by DOW AgroSciences LLC (EFSA-GMO-NL-2010-89) for placing on the market the genetically modified herbicide-tolerant maize DAS-40278-9 for food and feed uses, import and processing under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003.

EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 6, 2026

Enhanced Genome Editing with Cas9 Ribonucleoprotein in Diverse Cells and Organisms
09:51

Enhanced Genome Editing with Cas9 Ribonucleoprotein in Diverse Cells and Organisms

Published on: May 25, 2018

36.1K

eIF4E Resistance: Natural Variation Should Guide Gene Editing.

Anna Bastet1, Christophe Robaglia2, Jean-Luc Gallois3

  • 1GAFL, INRA, 84140, Montfavet, France; Aix Marseille University, Biologie Végétale et Microbiologie Environnementales UMR 7265, Laboratoire de Génétique et Biophysique des Plantes, Marseille F-13009, France; CNRS, UMR 7265 Biologie Végétale et Microbiologie Environnementales, Marseille F-13009, France; CEA, Bioscience and Biotechnology Institute of Aix-Marseille, Marseille F-13009, France.

Trends in Plant Science
|March 5, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Natural resistance to RNA viruses often involves translation initiation factors (eIF4E). Gene editing can create new resistance alleles by designing functional variants, overcoming redundancy issues in breeding for enhanced plant immunity.

More Related Videos

CRISPR/Cas9 Editing of the C. elegans rbm-3.2 Gene using the dpy-10 Co-CRISPR Screening Marker and Assembled Ribonucleoprotein Complexes.
07:46

CRISPR/Cas9 Editing of the C. elegans rbm-3.2 Gene using the dpy-10 Co-CRISPR Screening Marker and Assembled Ribonucleoprotein Complexes.

Published on: December 11, 2020

6.6K
A Standard Methodology to Examine On-site Mutagenicity As a Function of Point Mutation Repair Catalyzed by CRISPR/Cas9 and SsODN in Human Cells
10:07

A Standard Methodology to Examine On-site Mutagenicity As a Function of Point Mutation Repair Catalyzed by CRISPR/Cas9 and SsODN in Human Cells

Published on: August 25, 2017

8.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 6, 2026

Enhanced Genome Editing with Cas9 Ribonucleoprotein in Diverse Cells and Organisms
09:51

Enhanced Genome Editing with Cas9 Ribonucleoprotein in Diverse Cells and Organisms

Published on: May 25, 2018

36.1K
CRISPR/Cas9 Editing of the C. elegans rbm-3.2 Gene using the dpy-10 Co-CRISPR Screening Marker and Assembled Ribonucleoprotein Complexes.
07:46

CRISPR/Cas9 Editing of the C. elegans rbm-3.2 Gene using the dpy-10 Co-CRISPR Screening Marker and Assembled Ribonucleoprotein Complexes.

Published on: December 11, 2020

6.6K
A Standard Methodology to Examine On-site Mutagenicity As a Function of Point Mutation Repair Catalyzed by CRISPR/Cas9 and SsODN in Human Cells
10:07

A Standard Methodology to Examine On-site Mutagenicity As a Function of Point Mutation Repair Catalyzed by CRISPR/Cas9 and SsODN in Human Cells

Published on: August 25, 2017

8.5K

Area of Science:

  • Plant molecular biology
  • Virology
  • Genetics

Background:

  • Translation initiation factors, specifically eukaryotic initiation factor 4E (eIF4E), are key susceptibility factors for RNA viruses.
  • Natural resistance alleles in eIF4E typically maintain protein function while conferring resistance.
  • Gene editing offers a way to introduce viral resistance in crops lacking natural alleles, often by targeting eIF4E genes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the challenges posed by eIF4E gene redundancy in developing virus-resistant crops using gene editing.
  • To explore the potential of designing novel, functional eIF4E alleles for enhanced viral resistance.
  • To leverage evolutionary insights into eIF4E gene diversification for agricultural applications.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of eIF4E gene redundancy in plant species.
  • Application of gene-editing technologies to modify eIF4E genes.
  • Evaluation of engineered eIF4E alleles for viral resistance and plant physiology.

Main Results:

  • Gene redundancy among eIF4E factors can limit the effectiveness of simple knockout strategies for breeding viral resistance.
  • Designing de novo functional eIF4E alleles presents a viable alternative to overcome redundancy.
  • Engineered eIF4E alleles can confer resistance to viruses without compromising essential plant physiological functions.

Conclusions:

  • Redundancy in eIF4E genes necessitates advanced gene-editing strategies beyond simple knockouts for effective viral resistance breeding.
  • Designing functional eIF4E alleles, informed by natural evolutionary patterns, is a promising approach for durable viral resistance in crops.
  • This strategy offers a path to enhance crop immunity without detrimental effects on plant growth and development.