Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 6, 2026

Novel Apparatus and Method for Drug Reinforcement
Published on: August 20, 2010
The Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970: Retrospective Assessments of Disparate Treatment and Consequential
Hide Yamatani1, Marvin Feit2, Aaron Mann1
1a School of Social Work , University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA.
Abstract:
Although the basic paradigm of the U.S. federal drug policy targeting the supply and demand reduction has not changed since its enactment in 1970, there have been seriously undesirable disparate treatments and impacts among various population groups. Although U.S. Congress could not define what is discrimination, it did provide two major criteria for the assessment of discriminatory practices as follows: (a) disparate treatment-basing a key decision on association with any of the five prohibited individual's demographic classifications (race, color, religion, sex, or national origin); and (b) disparate impact-correlation between any of the five prohibited demographic classifications and the key outcomes. In reference to those criteria, this article describes evidence-based indicators of national failure of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act.
Related Concept Videos
Drug Regulation
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Drug Control Governance: Regulatory Bodies and Their Impact
Drug Abuse and Addiction: Pharmacological Phenomena
Drug Toxicity: Risk factors
Drug Toxicity: Dose-Dependent Reactions

