Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 6, 2026

Pulse Wave Velocity Testing in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging
Published on: February 7, 2014
Comparison of methods for the evaluation of NIBP from pulse transit time
Abstract:
Non-invasive blood pressure measurement (NIBP) is one of the most discussed topic in cardiovascular medicine. Currently continuous measurement of blood pressure is possible by invasive methods, which makes the measurement impractical for Doctors and uncomfortable for the patients. It is possible to use special devices to measure blood pressure noninvasively continuously but there are still some problems with long time monitoring and comfort for patient. Physiologically there is connection between electrical and mechanical heart functions, propagation of pulse wave and blood pressure value. Our paper investigates various methods for the evaluation of NIPB from pulse transit time. We analyse real signals which we obtained during surgical interventions in Hospital, with invasive measurements of blood pressure waves, and non-invasive measurements of pulse waves and ECG signal.
Related Concept Videos
Sites for measuring blood pressure
The Brachial Artery: Primary Site for Blood Pressure Measurement
Equipments Used To Measure Blood Pressure
This invasive approach involves cannulating a peripheral artery. During each cardiac contraction, pressure generates mechanical motion within the catheter, transmitted through rigid, fluid-filled tubing to a transducer. This transducer converts mechanical motion into electrical signals displayed as waveforms on a monitor. An automatic flushing system prevents blood backflow. Due to the potential risk of unexpected arterial blood loss, this method is primarily used in intensive...
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(one-step method)
Prepare for the Procedure:
Special considerations while measuring pulse
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.

