Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 6, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
Published on: August 29, 2025
What Do You Think You Are Measuring? A Mixed-Methods Procedure for Assessing the Content Validity of Test Items and
Ingrid Koller1, Michael R Levenson2, Judith Glück1
1Department of Psychology, Alpen-Adria-Universität Klagenfurt Klagenfurt, Austria.
Abstract:
The valid measurement of latent constructs is crucial for psychological research. Here, we present a mixed-methods procedure for improving the precision of construct definitions, determining the content validity of items, evaluating the representativeness of items for the target construct, generating test items, and analyzing items on a theoretical basis. To illustrate the mixed-methods content-scaling-structure (CSS) procedure, we analyze the Adult Self-Transcendence Inventory, a self-report measure of wisdom (ASTI, Levenson et al., 2005). A content-validity analysis of the ASTI items was used as the basis of psychometric analyses using multidimensional item response models (N = 1215). We found that the new procedure produced important suggestions concerning five subdimensions of the ASTI that were not identifiable using exploratory methods. The study shows that the application of the suggested procedure leads to a deeper understanding of latent constructs. It also demonstrates the advantages of theory-based item analysis.
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
Measures of Intelligence
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this;...
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory
Scaling
Spearman's Rank Correlation Test
Spearman's test calculates correlation by...

