Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Biostatistics: Overview

Biostatistics: Overview

Biostatistics plays a crucial role in understanding and analyzing data in healthcare and biology. Biostatisticians conduct experiments, gather evidence, and draw meaningful conclusions using statistical methods and techniques. Different variables form the foundation of biostatistical analysis, allowing researchers to understand and interpret data effectively. These variables are classified into different types, each serving a specific purpose in statistical analysis.
Discrete variables are...

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...

Survival Tree

Survival Tree

Survival trees are a non-parametric method used in survival analysis to model the relationship between a set of covariates and the time until an event of interest occurs, often referred to as the "time-to-event" or "survival time." This method is particularly useful when dealing with censored data, where the event has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period, or when the exact time of the event is unknown.
Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Real-world outcomes for lisocabtagene maraleucel in patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma.

Blood·2026

Same author

Rforce: Random Forests for Composite Endpoints.

Statistics in medicine·2026

Same author

The Cox Model With Adaptive Fused Group Bridge Penalty to Incorporate Historical Data Into the Analysis of Clinical Trials With an Application to BMT CTN 1101.

Statistics in medicine·2025

Same author

New comorbidity index associated with survival after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for large B-cell lymphoma.

Blood advances·2025

Same author

Real-world outcomes of brexucabtagene autoleucel for relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma: a CIBMTR analysis.

Blood advances·2025

Same author

An Efficient Estimation Method for Additive Subdistribution Hazards Model With Left-Truncated Competing Risks Data Under the Case-Cohort Study Design.

Statistics in medicine·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 6, 2026

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Published on: June 26, 2013

Combining biomarkers for classification with covariate adjustment.

Soyoung Kim¹, Ying Huang²

¹Division of Biostatistics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, U.S.A.

Statistics in Medicine

|March 10, 2017

Summary

This study introduces a new method to improve biomarker combination accuracy by adjusting for covariates. The approach enhances classification performance, offering a robust alternative to existing regression-based techniques.

Keywords:

area under the ROC curve biomarker combination classification covariate adjustment receiver operating characteristic curve

More Related Videos

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 6, 2026

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Published on: June 26, 2013

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Area of Science:

Biostatistics
Biomarker Discovery
Medical Diagnostics

Background:

Biomarker combinations enhance classification accuracy over single markers.
Covariates can impact biomarker performance and combination effectiveness.
Existing methods for covariate adjustment in marker combinations are limited.

Purpose of the Study:

To examine covariate effects on linear biomarker combinations.
To propose a novel method for covariate adjustment in marker combinations.
To develop a robust estimator for the best linear biomarker combination.

Main Methods:

Maximizing the nonparametric estimate of the area under the covariate-adjusted ROC curve.
Developing a consistent and asymptotically normal estimator.
Evaluating performance through simulations in cohort and case/control designs.

Main Results:

The proposed method provides covariate adjustment for marker combinations.
The estimator demonstrates consistency and asymptotic normality.
Simulations and a human immunodeficiency virus vaccine trial application validate the approach.

Conclusions:

The proposed method effectively adjusts for covariates in biomarker combinations.
It offers a robust alternative to regression-model-based approaches.
This technique improves the reliability of biomarker combination performance evaluation.