Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 6, 2026

Interphase Fluorescence in situ Hybridization of Bone Marrow Smears of Multiple Myeloma
Published on: April 15, 2022
Additional-structural-chromosomal aberrations are associated with inferior clinical outcome in patients with
Adrian A Carballo-Zarate1, L Jeffrey Medeiros1, Lianghua Fang1,2
1Department of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Abstract:
Multiple myeloma is cytogenetically heterogeneous and a hyperdiploid karyotype is considered currently to have standard risk. In this study, we investigated the clinical impact of additional-structural-chromosomal aberrations assessed by chromosome analysis in 284 patients with a hyperdiploid karyotype that were subdivided into four groups based on the complexity of additional-structural-chromosomal aberrations: group 1, no additional-structural-chromosomal aberrations (n=35); group 2, one additional-structural-chromosomal aberration (n=46); group 3, two additional-structural-chromosomal aberrations (n=39); group 4, ≥three additional-structural-chromosomal aberrations (n=164). Clinicopathological data among these groups showed no differences, except patients in group 1 had higher hemoglobin (P=0.031) and albumin (P=0.045) levels. The median follow-up was 55 months (range, 3-221). The median overall survival of patients in groups 1-4 was negatively correlated with the number of the additional-structural-chromosomal aberrations: 98, 76, 61, and 48 months, respectively (P<0.0001). In group 4, CKS1B gain, RB1, or TP53 deletions had no additional impact on overall survival; however, trisomy 3 or 15 conferred a much better overall survival, and monosomy 13 and 14 predicted a worse outcome. In addition, the overall survival of patients in groups 3 and 4 was similar to a subset of high-risk multiple myeloma cases (n=21) (P=0.387). About 192 (67.6%) patients who received stem cell transplantation did not show improved overall survival compared with non-stem cell transplantation patients (n=92; P=0.142) overall; however, they did show significantly improved overall survival in patients with refractory disease in group 4 (P=0.0084). Multivariate analysis showed that two or more additional-structural-chromosomal aberrations (P<0.0001), stages (P=0.02 and P=0.002) and relapsed disease (P=0.009) negatively impacted the overall survival. We conclude that hyperdiploid karyotypes in multiple myeloma are associated with additional-structural-chromosomal aberrations and a greater number of additional-structural-chromosomal aberrations predicts poorer clinical outcome. A hyperdiploid karyotype with ≥2 additional-structural-chromosomal aberrations at chromosomal level should be considered an independent high-risk factor.
Insights
Multiple myeloma with hyperdiploid karyotypes can have varying risks. More additional-structural-chromosomal aberrations in these myeloma patients predict poorer outcomes, identifying a new high-risk factor.
Area of Science:
- Hematology
- Cytogenetics
- Oncology
Background:
- Multiple myeloma exhibits cytogenetic heterogeneity.
- Hyperdiploid karyotypes are typically associated with standard risk in multiple myeloma.
- The prognostic significance of additional-structural-chromosomal aberrations in hyperdiploid multiple myeloma requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the clinical impact of additional-structural-chromosomal aberrations in patients with hyperdiploid multiple myeloma.
- To correlate the number of aberrations with overall survival and clinicopathological features.
- To identify independent prognostic factors for multiple myeloma outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Chromosome analysis was performed on 284 multiple myeloma patients with hyperdiploid karyotypes.
- Patients were stratified into four groups based on the number of additional-structural-chromosomal aberrations.
- Overall survival and clinicopathological data were analyzed using univariate and multivariate methods.
Main Results:
- Overall survival was negatively correlated with the number of additional-structural-chromosomal aberrations (98, 76, 61, and 48 months for 0, 1, 2, and ≥3 aberrations, respectively).
- Patients with two or more aberrations showed outcomes similar to high-risk multiple myeloma.
- Multivariate analysis identified ≥2 aberrations, advanced stages, and relapsed disease as negative prognostic factors.
Conclusions:
- Hyperdiploid karyotypes in multiple myeloma are frequently associated with additional-structural-chromosomal aberrations.
- An increasing number of these aberrations predicts a poorer clinical outcome.
- A hyperdiploid karyotype with ≥2 additional-structural-chromosomal aberrations should be considered an independent high-risk factor in multiple myeloma.
Related Concept Videos
Karyotyping
Abnormal Proliferation
Nondisjunction
Nondisjunction

