Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 6, 2026

Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy DISE with Target Controlled Infusion TCI and Bispectral Analysis in Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Published on: December 6, 2016
Etomidate versus propofol sedation for complex upper endoscopic procedures: a prospective double-blinded randomized
Mi Gang Kim1, Se Woo Park1, Jae Hyun Kim1
1Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.
Etomidate sedation for endoscopic procedures showed fewer respiratory events and better efficacy than propofol. However, etomidate was linked to more myoclonus and higher blood pressure, impacting patient safety during sedation.
Area of Science:
- Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine
- Gastroenterology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Propofol-induced deep sedation is effective but frequently causes cardiopulmonary adverse events.
- Etomidate offers hemodynamic and respiratory stability, particularly beneficial for high-risk patients.
- Endoscopic procedures necessitate safe and effective sedation strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the safety and efficacy of etomidate versus propofol for sedation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedures.
- To evaluate cardiopulmonary adverse events, respiratory depression, and overall physician satisfaction between the two anesthetic agents.
Main Methods:
- A randomized, blinded study involving 128 patients undergoing endoscopic ultrasound (EUS).
- Patients were randomized to receive either etomidate or propofol for sedation, administered by a registered nurse.
- The primary outcome measured was the proportion of patients experiencing any cardiopulmonary adverse events.
Main Results:
- Overall cardiopulmonary adverse events did not differ significantly between etomidate and propofol groups (34.38% vs. 51.56%, P = .074).
- Etomidate demonstrated significantly lower incidence of oxygen desaturation (6.25% vs. 31.25%, P = .001) and respiratory depression (7.81% vs. 32.81%, P = .001).
- Myoclonus was more frequent with etomidate (34.37% vs. 12.50%, P = .012), and systolic blood pressure was higher in the etomidate group. Physician satisfaction was greater with etomidate.
Conclusions:
- Etomidate provides better sedative efficacy and fewer respiratory complications compared to propofol during endoscopic procedures.
- Etomidate use is associated with a higher incidence of myoclonus and elevated blood pressure.
- The choice between etomidate and propofol for endoscopic sedation requires balancing efficacy and safety profiles, considering potential adverse events.
More Related Videos
05:43Topical Airway Anesthesia for Awake-endoscopic Intubation Using the Spray-as-you-go Technique with High Oxygen Flow
Published on: January 13, 2017
05:39Author Spotlight: A Non-Intubated Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery with Multimodal Analgesia and Sevoflurane Inhalation Anesthesia
Published on: May 26, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Parenteral Anesthetics: Overview
Stages of General Anesthesia
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Endoscopic Procedures I: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
During an EGD, the endoscope can be used to:
General Anesthesia: Overview
General anesthesia induces unconsciousness in the whole body, while the others target specific areas or sensations. It is administered to minimize adverse effects, maintain...
Inhalational Anesthetics: Overview