Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 6, 2026

Targeted Next-generation Sequencing and Bioinformatics Pipeline to Evaluate Genetic Determinants of Constitutional Disease
Published on: April 4, 2018
Evaluating the Calling Performance of a Rare Disease NGS Panel for Single Nucleotide and Copy Number Variants
P Cacheiro1,2, A Ordóñez-Ugalde1, B Quintáns1,2
1Neurogenetics Group, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (IDIS), Hospital Clínico de Santiago, level-2, Travesía da Choupana s/n, 15706, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Optimizing next-generation sequencing (NGS) variant detection is crucial for rare diseases. Combining multiple variant callers enhances the efficiency of single nucleotide variant (SNV) and copy number variant (CNV) detection in clinical diagnostics.
Area of Science:
- Genetics and Genomics
- Bioinformatics
- Clinical Diagnostics
Background:
- Clinical next-generation sequencing (NGS) requires application-specific optimization for variant detection.
- Accurate identification of single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and copy number variants (CNVs) is critical for diagnosing rare genetic diseases.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the performance of different variant detection programs for SNVs and CNVs using an NGS panel in patients with a rare disease.
- To evaluate the calling efficiency and accuracy of various bioinformatics tools for variant detection in a clinical setting.
Main Methods:
- Sequenced 30 genes in 83 patients with hereditary spastic paraplegia using an NGS panel.
- Compared variant calls from LifeScope, GATK UnifiedGenotyper, and GATK HaplotypeCaller against Sanger sequencing for SNVs and indels.
- Assessed copy number variant (CNV) detection using ExomeDepth, panelcn.MOPS, and CNVPanelizer for five multiexon deletions.
Main Results:
- 94% of SNVs and 20% of indels were consistently detected by all SNV callers.
- Two SNVs were missed due to rare reference alleles, and one was missed in a low-coverage region.
- ExomeDepth accurately detected all 5/5 multi-exon deletions, panelcn.MOPS detected 4/5, and CNVPanelizer detected 3/5.
Conclusions:
- NGS variant caller performance for SNVs depends on variant type and sequencing coverage.
- CNV detection algorithms can identify large deletions from NGS data, but sensitivity is affected by coverage, reference set, and deletion size.
- Incorporating multiple variant callers into NGS pipelines is recommended to maximize detection efficiency for clinical applications.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
Next-generation Sequencing
Next-Generation Sequencing Methods
Although all next-generation methods use different technologies, they all share a set of standard features....

