Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis01:10

Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis

1.9K
The nurse documents nursing diagnoses and enters them into the patient record. The identified patient's nursing diagnosis is either written out with a plan of care or entered into the electronic health record.
In some settings, data-driven computerized decision support systems are in place, allowing for more accurate nursing diagnoses. The database within one of these systems includes diagnostic labels defining characteristics, activities, and indicators for nursing. A nurse enters...
1.9K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

11.2K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.2K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

15.7K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
15.7K
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring01:25

Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring

1.6K
Blood pressure monitoring is a crucial clinical procedure in diagnosing and managing various cardiovascular conditions. Despite its significance, the accuracy of blood pressure measurements can be compromised by multiple factors, potentially leading to either falsely high or low readings. These inaccuracies are critical as they can significantly impact patient care. So, it is vital to understand these challenges deeply and adopt strategic approaches to minimize errors.
Several factors...
1.6K
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

11.7K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
11.7K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

649
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
649

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Brain MRI microbleeds and risk of intracranial hemorrhage in atrial fibrillation patients: A Swedish case-control study.

Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association·2024
Same author

Cost-Effectiveness of Performing Reference Ultrasonography in Patients with Deep Vein Thrombosis.

Thrombosis and haemostasis·2023
Same author

Detection of upper extremity deep vein thrombosis by magnetic resonance non-contrast thrombus imaging.

Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH·2021
Same author

Cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing recurrent ipsilateral deep vein thrombosis.

Blood advances·2021
Same author

Hyperdense artery sign, symptomatic infarct swelling and effect of alteplase in acute ischaemic stroke.

Stroke and vascular neurology·2020
Same author

Safety of using the combination of the Wells rule and D-dimer test for excluding acute recurrent ipsilateral deep vein thrombosis.

Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 6, 2026

A Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Eating Disorder Analysis and Diagnosis
04:19

A Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Eating Disorder Analysis and Diagnosis

Published on: May 10, 2022

4.7K

[Diagnostic errors are prevalent and hard to measure].

Anders von Heijne1

  • 1Danderyds sjukhus - Röntgenavd Stockholm, Sweden Danderyds sjukhus - Röntgenavd Stockholm, Sweden.

Lakartidningen
|March 15, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Diagnostic errors in healthcare are common and complex, stemming from cognitive and system issues. Addressing these requires improved measurement, education, and team-based approaches to minimize patient harm.

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Quality and Safety
  • Medical Education
  • Cognitive Science

Background:

  • Diagnostic errors are frequent in healthcare, leading to adverse events.
  • These errors arise from a complex mix of cognitive, systemic, and knowledge-related factors.
  • The standard diagnostic process can be disrupted by cognitive biases, insufficient information, and external stressors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the prevalence and challenges in measuring diagnostic errors.
  • To explore the contributing factors to diagnostic errors, including cognitive and system-based issues.
  • To propose potential strategies for mitigating diagnostic errors and improving patient safety.

Main Methods:

  • Review of cognitive science principles, including dual process theory and cognitive biases.

More Related Videos

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

17.4K
Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
07:31

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Published on: May 15, 2020

8.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 6, 2026

A Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Eating Disorder Analysis and Diagnosis
04:19

A Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Eating Disorder Analysis and Diagnosis

Published on: May 10, 2022

4.7K
Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

17.4K
Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
07:31

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Published on: May 15, 2020

8.2K
  • Analysis of the diagnostic process and factors that can derail it.
  • Identification of potential interventions and necessary developments for error measurement.

    • Main Results:

    • Diagnostic errors are multifactorial, involving cognitive limitations and system vulnerabilities.
    • Cognitive science offers insights into biases that impact diagnostic accuracy.
    • Potential remedies include enhanced education, feedback, lifelong learning, multidisciplinary teams, and decision support.

    Conclusions:

    • Validated methods for measuring diagnostic errors and standardized terminology are crucial.
    • Robust protocols are essential for managing identified diagnostic errors and reducing patient harm.
    • A systems approach integrating cognitive insights and practical interventions is needed to improve diagnostic accuracy.