Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Virtual Work01:20

Virtual Work

1.6K
The principle of virtual work states that if a body is in static and dynamic equilibrium, then the sum of all the virtual work done by all external forces and couple moments for any given virtual displacement must be zero.
In static equilibrium, a body can experience an imaginary or virtual movement, such as displacement or rotation. The virtual work done by a force is equal to the dot product of force and virtual displacement in the direction of the force. When it comes to virtually rotating a...
1.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

SETY©: A next-generation robotic training platform for safe and autonomous surgery in space - surgical biomechatronics design and Hardware-Software integration within the SY-MIS project.

Journal of robotic surgery·2025
Same author

Flexible robotic platforms for surgical applications in microgravity environments: a comprehensive systematic review of minimally invasive mechatronic systems and the impact of artificial intelligence on behalf of the Center for Space Systems (C-SET) & TROGSS-The Robotic Global Surgical Society.

Journal of robotic surgery·2025
Same author

Evaluation Challenges for the Application of Extended Reality Devices in Medicine.

Journal of digital imaging·2022
Same author

Anatomical Engineering and 3D Printing for Surgery and Medical Devices: International Review and Future Exponential Innovations.

BioMed research international·2022
Same journal

Beyond accessibility: co-designing mHealth to bridge the physical activity gap for people with disabilities.

mHealth·2026
Same journal

Smart home Internet of Things-based behavioural analysis for early detection of cognitive decline: toward Saudi future vision.

mHealth·2026
Same journal

A systematic review assessing mobile health (mHealth) physical activity interventions in older adults with and without chronic health conditions.

mHealth·2026
Same journal

Acceptability of an adolescent lifestyle mHealth app: a qualitative study using focus groups and interviews.

mHealth·2026
Same journal

Evaluation of AI-generated versus registered dietitian-authored nutrition responses: a cross-sectional study.

mHealth·2026
Same journal

A cross-sectional analysis of low-cost non-cancer registry recruitment sources for a hybrid type 2 trial evaluating a digital intervention for melanoma survivors.

mHealth·2026
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 6, 2026

Using Virtual Reality to Transfer Motor Skill Knowledge from One Hand to Another
05:12

Using Virtual Reality to Transfer Motor Skill Knowledge from One Hand to Another

Published on: September 18, 2017

549.1K

Virtual reality, augmented reality…I call it i-Reality.

Rafael J Grossmann1

  • 1Eastern Maine Medical Center, Bangor, Maine, USA.

Mhealth
|March 16, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This article introduces the concept of "improved reality" (i-Reality) as a unifying term for virtual and augmented reality technologies. It explores how these digital enhancements can assist medical professionals in performing tasks more effectively. By bridging the gap between patient needs and provider availability, i-Reality could transform clinical interactions. The authors propose that these tools offer specific advantages during medical procedures. This framework aims to standardize terminology for immersive technologies in healthcare settings. Ultimately, the paper suggests that integrating these digital features may improve overall patient care outcomes.

Keywords:
Improved reality (i-Reality)healthcarepatientproviderimmersive technologyclinical workflowsmedical innovationdigital transformation

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Revolutionizing Remote Surgery with Augmented Reality and Robotics for Enhanced Precision and Accessibility
07:46

Author Spotlight: Revolutionizing Remote Surgery with Augmented Reality and Robotics for Enhanced Precision and Accessibility

Published on: August 9, 2024

1.2K
Photorealistic Learned Landscapes for Augmented Reality
06:54

Photorealistic Learned Landscapes for Augmented Reality

Published on: June 27, 2025

834

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 6, 2026

Using Virtual Reality to Transfer Motor Skill Knowledge from One Hand to Another
05:12

Using Virtual Reality to Transfer Motor Skill Knowledge from One Hand to Another

Published on: September 18, 2017

549.1K
Author Spotlight: Revolutionizing Remote Surgery with Augmented Reality and Robotics for Enhanced Precision and Accessibility
07:46

Author Spotlight: Revolutionizing Remote Surgery with Augmented Reality and Robotics for Enhanced Precision and Accessibility

Published on: August 9, 2024

1.2K
Photorealistic Learned Landscapes for Augmented Reality
06:54

Photorealistic Learned Landscapes for Augmented Reality

Published on: June 27, 2025

834

Area of Science:

  • Health informatics and medical education research
  • Digital health and i-Reality integration within clinical practice

Background:

No consensus exists regarding the terminology used to describe immersive digital technologies within clinical environments. That uncertainty drove the development of a unified framework for these diverse tools. Prior research has shown that virtual environments offer potential benefits for surgical training and patient education. However, existing labels often fail to capture the specific utility of these systems in medical practice. This gap motivated the proposal of a new, inclusive term to categorize these digital enhancements. Researchers have long sought to bridge the divide between technological innovation and practical healthcare application. The current literature remains fragmented, lacking a cohesive definition for digital features that improve real-world tasks. This paper addresses the need for a standardized lexicon to facilitate better communication among medical professionals and technology developers.

Purpose Of The Study:

The primary aim of this study is to introduce the term i-Reality to unify virtual and augmented reality concepts. This research addresses the lack of a cohesive definition for immersive technologies in medicine. The authors seek to categorize digital features that offer tangible advantages during clinical tasks. By establishing this framework, the study intends to clarify the role of digital enhancements in healthcare. The researchers investigate how these tools can improve the interaction between medical providers and patients. This work is motivated by the need to address the high demand for clinical services. The study explores the potential of these technologies to mitigate the shortage of medical professionals. Ultimately, the authors aim to provide a standardized lexicon for the field of digital health.

Main Methods:

The authors conducted a conceptual analysis to synthesize existing definitions of immersive technologies. This review approach involved evaluating the functional utility of virtual and augmented reality in clinical settings. Researchers examined how these tools provide specific advantages during medical procedures. The study design focused on identifying commonalities between disparate digital platforms. Investigators assessed the potential for these systems to enhance real-world environments. This methodology prioritized the practical application of technology over technical specifications. The team synthesized literature to propose a unified terminology for the field. This systematic evaluation supports the introduction of a new, inclusive label for digital enhancements.

Main Results:

The strongest finding indicates that i-Reality effectively categorizes virtual and augmented reality under a single, functional framework. This classification highlights the capacity of these tools to offer advantages during specific medical acts. The authors report that these digital enhancements can bridge the gap between patient demand and provider supply. By improving the interaction between clinicians and patients, these systems show promise for clinical efficiency. The study demonstrates that these features are not merely immersive but specifically designed to improve real-world outcomes. The researchers emphasize that this term encompasses both virtual and augmented environments. This result suggests that a unified lexicon could simplify the adoption of digital tools in healthcare. The findings provide a clear rationale for grouping these technologies based on their clinical utility.

Conclusions:

The authors propose that i-Reality serves as a comprehensive term for virtual and augmented reality applications. These digital enhancements offer distinct advantages during specific clinical procedures. By integrating these tools, healthcare systems might address the persistent mismatch between provider supply and patient demand. The researchers suggest that improved interaction between clinicians and patients remains a primary benefit of this technology. This synthesis implies that standardized terminology could streamline the adoption of immersive tools in hospitals. The authors maintain that these features represent a significant evolution in how medical acts are performed. Future discussions should consider the practical implementation of these digital enhancements across various specialties. This framework provides a starting point for evaluating the impact of i-Reality on modern medical workflows.

The researchers propose that i-Reality functions as an umbrella term encompassing virtual and augmented reality. This classification aims to highlight digital features that provide specific advantages during medical acts, rather than focusing solely on the underlying hardware or software architecture.

The authors define this concept as a real world environment augmented with digitally created features. Unlike standard virtual reality, which replaces the physical space, this framework emphasizes enhancements that offer a tangible benefit during clinical tasks.

A standardized definition is necessary to bridge the gap between high patient demand and limited provider supply. The authors argue that consistent terminology facilitates better integration of these digital tools into routine medical practice.

This data type represents the digital layer added to the physical environment. By incorporating these features, the authors suggest that providers can improve their interaction with patients during complex procedures.

The authors measure the utility of these systems by their ability to provide an advantage during a medical act. This phenomenon focuses on the practical improvement of clinical outcomes through enhanced digital support.

The researchers propose that adopting this term will improve the interaction between clinicians and patients. They suggest this shift could ultimately help mitigate the ongoing shortage of medical professionals by increasing efficiency.