Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 6, 2026

05:48
The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
Published on: June 12, 2020
6.5K
Neuroscientific insights into the development of analogical reasoning
Kirstie J Whitaker1, Michael S Vendetti2,3, Carter Wendelken2,4
1Brain Mapping Unit, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, UK.
Developmental Science
|March 16, 2017
Summary
Children
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Developmental Psychology
Background:
- Analogical reasoning, the ability to map relationships between concepts, is crucial for knowledge acquisition and learning.
- Understanding how analogical reasoning develops throughout childhood and adolescence is key to understanding cognitive development.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the neural mechanisms underlying the improvement of analogical reasoning with age.
- To examine the roles of controlled semantic retrieval, response control, and relational integration in this developmental process.
Main Methods:
- Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to analyze brain activity in 95 typically developing children aged 6–18 years.
- Participants completed a pictorial propositional analogy task assessing semantic relation understanding.
Main Results:
- While a common network of brain regions was recruited across all ages, activation in the left anterior prefrontal cortex (BA 47/45) positively correlated with age.
- This region, associated with controlled semantic retrieval, showed increased activation with age and improved task performance, even after controlling for age.
Conclusions:
- Enhanced analogical reasoning in children and adolescents is significantly linked to improved controlled semantic retrieval abilities.
- Developmental gains in analogical reasoning are primarily driven by the capacity to selectively access and retrieve relevant semantic information.
Related Concept Videos
Reasoning
487
Reasoning is the action of thinking about something in a logical, sensible way. It is integral to problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking. Reasoning can be inductive or deductive. Reasoning involves transforming information into conclusions, which is essential for problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking.
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
487
Inductive Reasoning
68.9K
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
68.9K
Reason and Intuition
7.6K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.6K
Deductive Reasoning
71.1K
Deductive reasoning, or deduction, is the type of logic used in hypothesis-based science. In deductive reasoning, the pattern of thinking moves in the opposite direction as compared to inductive reasoning, which means that it uses a general principle or law to predict specific results. From those general principles, a scientist can deduce and predict the specific results that would be valid as long as the general principles are valid.
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
71.1K
Piaget's Stage 4 of Cognitive Development
815
The formal operational stage, as described in Piaget's cognitive development theory, begins around age 11 and extends into adulthood. It marks the emergence of advanced cognitive abilities that differentiate adolescent and adult thinking from those of younger children. This stage is characterized by abstract reasoning, hypothetical-deductive reasoning, and a more complex understanding of self and others.
Abstract Reasoning and Hypothetical-Deductive Thinking
Unlike the concrete operational...
Abstract Reasoning and Hypothetical-Deductive Thinking
Unlike the concrete operational...
815
Introduction to Cognitive Psychology
2.9K
Cognitive psychology is the field of psychology dedicated to examining how people think. It attempts to explain how and why we think the way we do by studying the interactions among human thinking, emotion, creativity, language, and problem-solving, as well as other cognitive processes. Cognitive psychology studies how information is processed and manipulated in remembering, thinking, and knowing.
This field emerged in the mid-20th century, following a period dominated by behaviorism, which...
This field emerged in the mid-20th century, following a period dominated by behaviorism, which...
2.9K

