Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Editor's Notebook: November 2024.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2025
Same author

Editor's Notebook: September 2024.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2025
Same author

Editor's Notebook: October 2024.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2025
Same author

Editor's Notebook: December 2024.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2025
Same author

Editor's Notebook: April 2025.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2025
Same author

Editor's Notebook: February 2025.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 6, 2026

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

7.6K

Academic Radiologist Subspecialty Identification Using a Novel Claims-Based Classification System.

Andrew B Rosenkrantz1, Wenyi Wang2, Danny R Hughes2,3

  • 11 Department of Radiology, Center for Biomedical Imaging, NYU School of Medicine, NYU Langone Medical Center, 660 First Ave, 3rd Fl, New York, NY 10016.

AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology
|March 17, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A new claims-based system accurately identifies academic radiologists by subspecialty using Medicare data. This method is more effective than current Medicare codes for subspecialty classification and performance metrics.

Keywords:
academic practiceradiologistssubspecialties

More Related Videos

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
13:44

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

Published on: August 30, 2013

43.7K
Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data
14:27

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Published on: June 26, 2013

16.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 6, 2026

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

7.6K
Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
13:44

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

Published on: August 30, 2013

43.7K
Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data
14:27

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Published on: June 26, 2013

16.4K

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Radiology
  • Medical Economics

Background:

  • Accurate identification of radiologist subspecialties is crucial for performance metrics and value-based care.
  • Current Medicare physician specialty identifiers are insufficient for precise subspecialty classification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess a novel claims-based classification system for identifying academic radiologist subspecialties.
  • To evaluate the feasibility of using Medicare Part B data for subspecialty payer identification.

Main Methods:

  • Mapped Medicare Part B services billed by radiologists (2012-2014) to subspecialties using the Neiman Imaging Types of Service (NITOS) system.
  • Calculated subspecialty work relative value units (RVUs) as a percentage of total billed RVUs.
  • Compared NITOS-based assignments with faculty website designations and existing Medicare classifications.

Main Results:

  • The NITOS-based system achieved high concordance with designated subspecialties, ranging from 71.3% to 98.9%.
  • A 50% work RVU threshold correctly classified 89.8% of radiologists.
  • Existing Medicare codes identified only 46.7% of nuclear medicine and 39.4% of interventional radiologists.

Conclusions:

  • Medicare claims data, utilizing the NITOS framework, can consistently identify academic radiologists by subspecialty.
  • This claims-based method offers superior accuracy compared to current Medicare physician specialty identifiers.
  • The system holds potential for facilitating appropriate performance metrics in value-based payment models.