Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Concepts of Health and Illness01:29

Concepts of Health and Illness

19.0K
Health is a condition of the body, mind, and spirit where an individual remains free from illness. Similarly, wellness is an active state, including living a lifestyle that promotes physical, mental, and emotional health. Physical health is critical for the overall well-being and can be affected by lifestyle, activity level, diet, and behavior. The highest attainable standard of health is a fundamental and universal human right. Consider Lisa, a fifteen-year-old born with congenital...
19.0K
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention II01:18

Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention II

2.2K
The person's health status fluctuates continually, varying from being in good health to becoming ill and returning to being healthy. To understand the concept of illness prevention, there are two models. First, the health-illness continuum model is a graphic representation of an individual's wellness. It states that a person is considered healthy in the absence of physical disease and the presence of good emotional health.
The agent-host-environment model states that disease results...
2.2K
Factors Affecting Illness01:18

Factors Affecting Illness

5.5K
When a person's physical, emotional, intellectual, social development or spiritual functioning is compromised, this deviation from a healthy normal state is called illness. Illness creates stress that in turn harms individuals. Irritation, anger, denial, hopelessness, and fear are behavioral and emotional changes an individual experiences in the phases of illness. A variety of factors influence a person's health and well-being.
For instance, risk factors are connected to illness,...
5.5K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

1.5K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.5K
Dimensions of Health and Illness01:21

Dimensions of Health and Illness

11.7K
The factors influencing the health-illness continuum can be internal or external and may or may not be under conscious control. They are related to the following eight human dimensions, and each dimension is interrelated to one other.
11.7K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

14.0K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
14.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Individual vices and institutional failings as drivers of vulnerabilisation.

Social epistemology·2026
Same author

What a mess: can we tidy up the concept of health?

Philosophical psychology·2025
Same author

A taste of your own medicine: the experience of a transplant.

Lancet (London, England)·2025
Same author

The pandemic body: the lived body during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Medical humanities·2023
Same author

Corrigendum: The pandemic experience survey II: A second corpus of subjective reports of life under social restrictions during COVID-19 in the UK, Japan, and Mexico.

Frontiers in public health·2023
Same author

The Pandemic Experience Survey II: A Second Corpus of Subject Reports of Life Under Social Restrictions During COVID-19 in the UK, Japan, and Mexico.

Frontiers in public health·2022
Same journal

The Balanced View of the Value of Conscience.

Journal of applied philosophy·2024
Same journal

Compulsory Vaccination and Nozickian Rights.

Journal of applied philosophy·2023
Same journal

The Mere Substitution Defence of Nudging Works for Neurointerventions Too.

Journal of applied philosophy·2023
Same journal

Self-Ownership and the Duty to Assist.

Journal of applied philosophy·2023
Same journal

Must We Vaccinate the Most Vulnerable? Efficiency, Priority, and Equality in the Distribution of Vaccines.

Journal of applied philosophy·2022
Same journal

The Ethics of Killing in a Pandemic: Unintentional Virus Transmission, Reciprocal Risk Imposition, and Standards of Blame.

Journal of applied philosophy·2022
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 6, 2026

The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress
09:12

The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress

Published on: July 4, 2013

72.9K

Epistemic Injustice and Illness.

Ian James Kidd1, Havi Carel2

  • 1Department of Philosophy University of Nottingham University Park Nottingham NG7 2RD UK.

Journal of Applied Philosophy
|March 18, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Patients experience epistemic injustice in healthcare, leading to testimonial frustration and hermeneutical marginalization. Understanding these issues is crucial for improving patient care and addressing systemic healthcare inequities.

More Related Videos

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

24.9K
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

13.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 6, 2026

The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress
09:12

The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress

Published on: July 4, 2013

72.9K
Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

24.9K
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

13.6K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Philosophy of Medicine
  • Social Sciences

Background:

  • Patients frequently report testimonial frustration and hermeneutical marginalization in healthcare settings.
  • These experiences negatively impact the quality of patient care and their overall well-being.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze epistemic injustice in contemporary healthcare.
  • To apply Miranda Fricker's framework to understand testimonial and hermeneutical injustice in medicine.
  • To identify healthcare-specific factors contributing to these injustices.

Main Methods:

  • Epistemic analysis drawing on philosophical concepts of injustice.
  • Examination of patient complaints regarding their healthcare experiences.
  • Identification of negative stereotypes and structural issues within healthcare.

Main Results:

  • Contemporary healthcare practices contribute to testimonial injustice, where patients' knowledge and experiences are dismissed.
  • Hermeneutical injustice arises from a lack of shared understanding or concepts to articulate patients' experiences.
  • Ill individuals are particularly susceptible to these forms of epistemic injustice due to systemic factors and stereotypes.

Conclusions:

  • Healthcare systems must address testimonial and hermeneutical injustice to improve patient care.
  • Recognizing and mitigating negative stereotypes and structural barriers is essential.
  • Further research is needed to develop effective interventions against epistemic injustice in healthcare.