Design Principles for Covalent Organic Frameworks in Energy Storage Applications
Sampath B Alahakoon1, Christina M Thompson1, Gino Occhialini1
1Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Texas, Dallas, 800 W. Campbell Rd., Richardson, TX, 75080, USA.
Chemsuschem
|March 18, 2017
Summary
Covalent organic frameworks (COFs) show promise for energy storage. This review covers their development for gas and electrical power applications, including design strategies and formation studies.
Area of Science:
- Materials Science
- Chemistry
Background:
- Covalent organic frameworks (COFs) are porous materials with significant potential for energy storage applications.
- Research into COFs for energy storage has been ongoing for over ten years.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the development of COFs for gas and electrical power storage.
- To discuss design strategies for enhancing gas sorption properties of COFs.
- To cover mechanistic studies on COF formation.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of COF research for energy storage.
- Analysis of design strategies for gas sorption.
- Examination of mechanistic studies on COF synthesis.
Main Results:
- COFs are versatile materials for both gas and electrical energy storage.
- Specific design strategies can optimize COF gas sorption capabilities.
- Understanding COF formation mechanisms is crucial for material development.
Conclusions:
- COFs represent a promising class of materials for advanced energy storage solutions.
- Further research into COF design and synthesis can unlock their full potential in energy applications.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
MO Theory and Covalent Bonding
14.5K
The molecular orbital theory describes the distribution of electrons in molecules in a manner similar to the distribution of electrons in atomic orbitals. The region of space in which a valence electron in a molecule is likely to be found is called a molecular orbital. Mathematically, the linear combination of atomic orbitals (LCAO) generates molecular orbitals. Combinations of in-phase atomic orbital wave functions result in regions with a high probability of electron density, while...
14.5K
Network Covalent Solids
16.4K
Network covalent solids contain a three-dimensional network of covalently bonded atoms as found in the crystal structures of nonmetals like diamond, graphite, silicon, and some covalent compounds, such as silicon dioxide (sand) and silicon carbide (carborundum, the abrasive on sandpaper). Many minerals have networks of covalent bonds.
To break or to melt a covalent network solid, covalent bonds must be broken. Because covalent bonds are relatively strong, covalent network solids are typically...
To break or to melt a covalent network solid, covalent bonds must be broken. Because covalent bonds are relatively strong, covalent network solids are typically...
16.4K
Crystal Field Theory - Octahedral Complexes
31.4K
Crystal Field Theory
To explain the observed behavior of transition metal complexes (such as colors), a model involving electrostatic interactions between the electrons from the ligands and the electrons in the unhybridized d orbitals of the central metal atom has been developed. This electrostatic model is crystal field theory (CFT). It helps to understand, interpret, and predict the colors, magnetic behavior, and some structures of coordination compounds of transition metals.
CFT focuses on...
To explain the observed behavior of transition metal complexes (such as colors), a model involving electrostatic interactions between the electrons from the ligands and the electrons in the unhybridized d orbitals of the central metal atom has been developed. This electrostatic model is crystal field theory (CFT). It helps to understand, interpret, and predict the colors, magnetic behavior, and some structures of coordination compounds of transition metals.
CFT focuses on...
31.4K
Covalent Bonding and Lewis Structures
65.4K
Compared to ionic bonds, which results from the transfer of electrons between metallic and nonmetallic atoms, covalent bonds result from the mutual attraction of atoms for a “shared” pair of electrons.
65.4K
Resonance and Hybrid Structures
28.2K
According to the theory of resonance, if two or more Lewis structures with the same arrangement of atoms can be written for a molecule, ion, or radical, the actual distribution of electrons is an average of that shown by the various Lewis structures.
Resonance Structures and Resonance Hybrids
The Lewis structure of a nitrite anion (NO2−) may actually be drawn in two different ways, distinguished by the locations of the N–O and N=O bonds.
Resonance Structures and Resonance Hybrids
The Lewis structure of a nitrite anion (NO2−) may actually be drawn in two different ways, distinguished by the locations of the N–O and N=O bonds.
28.2K
Formal Charges
40.9K
In some cases, there are seemingly more than one valid Lewis structures for molecules and polyatomic ions. The concept of formal charges can be used to help predict the most appropriate Lewis structure when more than one reasonable structure exists.
40.9K


