Effects of low and elevated CO₂ on C₃ and C₄ annuals : II. Photosynthesis and leaf biochemistry

Abutilon theophrasti (C₃) and Amaranthus retroflexus (C₄), were grown from seed at four partial pressures of CO₂: 15 Pa (below Pleistocene minimum), 27 Pa (pre-industrial), 35 Pa (current), and 70 Pa (future) in the Duke Phytotron under high light, high nutrient, and wellwatered conditions to evaluate their photosynthetic response to historic and future levels of CO₂. Net photosynthesis at growth CO₂ partial pressures increased with increasing CO₂ for C₃ plants, but not C₄ plants. Net photosynthesis of Abutilon at 15 Pa CO₂ was 70% less than that of plants grown at 35 Pa CO₂, due to greater stomatal and biochemical limitations at 15 Pa CO₂. Relative stomatal limitation (RSL) of Abutilon at 15 Pa CO₂ was nearly 3 times greater than at 35 Pa CO₂. A photosynthesis model was used to estimate ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase (rubisco) activity (Vc_max), electron transport mediated RuBP regeneration capacity (J _max), and phosphate regeneration capacity (PiRC) in Abutilon from net photosynthesis versus intercellular CO₂ (A-C _i) curves. All three component processes decreased by approximately 25% in Abutilon grown at 15 Pa compared with 35 Pa CO₂. Abutilon grown at 15 Pa CO₂ had significant reductions in total rubisco activity (25%), rubisco content (30%), activation state (29%), chlorophyll content (39%), N content (32%), and starch content (68%) compared with plants grown at 35 Pa CO₂. Greater allocation to rubisco relative to light reaction components and concomitant decreases in J _max and PiRC suggest co-regulation of biochemical processes occurred in Abutilon grown at 15 Pa CO₂. There were no significant differences in photosynthesis or leaf properties in Abutilon grown at 27 Pa CO₂ compared with 35 Pa CO₂, suggesting that the rise in CO₂ since the beginning of the industrial age has had little effect on the photosynthetic performance of Abutilon. For Amaranthus, limitations of photosynthesis were balanced between stomatal and biochemical factors such that net photosynthesis was similar in all CO₂ treatments. Differences in photosynthetic response to growth over a wide range of CO₂ partial pressures suggest changes in the relative performance of C₃ and C₄ annuals as atmospheric CO₂ has fluctuated over geologic time.