Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 6, 2026

07:41
Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems
Published on: July 30, 2019
8.1K
Density-dependent changes in individual foraging specialization of largemouth bass
D E Schindler1, James R Hodgson2, James F Kitchell1
1Center for Limnology, University of Wisconsin, 680 N. Park St., Madison, WI 53706, USA, , , , , , US.
Oecologia
|March 18, 2017
Summary
Individual largemouth bass show increased diet specialization when population densities are high. This behavioral flexibility, driven by individual foraging responses, is key to their keystone predator role.
Area of Science:
- Ecology
- Animal Behavior
- Fisheries Science
Background:
- Intraspecific variability in feeding strategies is crucial for understanding population dynamics.
- Ecological factors influencing individual foraging specialization remain poorly understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between conspecific density and diet specialization in individual largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides).
- To test if diet specialization intensifies during periods of high population density.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of stomach contents from marked individual largemouth bass over a 10-year period.
- Evaluation of diet consistency and overlap among individuals at varying population densities.
- Correlation of bass body condition with population size.
Main Results:
- Individual largemouth bass exhibited higher diet consistency during years with high population densities.
- Aggregate population diet composition remained stable, masking individual specialization.
- Bass body condition was inversely correlated with population size.
Conclusions:
- Population-level responses to density can obscure individual foraging specializations.
- Behavioral flexibility in individual foraging contributes to the keystone predator status of largemouth bass.
- Pooled sampling may underestimate the true extent of individual foraging specialization.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Selection
45.7K
Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
45.7K
Optimal Foraging
14.1K
How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.
14.1K
Frequency-dependent Selection
24.4K
When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.
24.4K
Derivatives: Problem Solving
128
Temperature-Dependent Growth of Brook TroutThe growth of brook trout is closely influenced by water temperature. Experimental data demonstrate how trout weight changes over a 24-day period in response to varying water temperatures. At lower temperatures, such as 15.5 degrees Celsius, brook trout show significant weight gain. However, as the temperature increases, the amount of weight gained steadily decreases. At the highest temperature measured, 24.4 degrees Celsius, trout experience a net...
128
Conservation of Small Populations
17.6K
Small population sizes put a species at extreme risk of extinction due to a lack of variation, and a consequent decrease in adaptability. This weakens the chances of survival under pressures such as climate change, competition from other species, or new diseases. Large populations are more likely to survive pressures such as these, as such populations are more likely to harbor individuals that have genetic variants that are adaptive under new stresses. Small populations are much less...
17.6K
Speciation Rates
23.2K
Overview
23.2K

