Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 6, 2026

BtM, a Low-cost Open-source Datalogger to Estimate the Water Content of Nonvascular Cryptogams
Published on: March 25, 2019
Water use physiologies of co-occurring goldenrods (Solidago juncea and S. canadensis): Implications for natural
1W. K. Kellogg Biological Station and Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Michigan State University, 49060, Hickory Corners, MI, USA.
Abstract:
Water use patterns and the seasonal progression of functional leaf area were determined for Solidago canadensis L. var. scabra and S. juncea Ait., two species of cooccurring goldenrods which differ in their competitive ability and distribution along soil moisture gradients. Field measurements of diurnal trends in stomatal conductances and leaf water potentials indicate little difference between the species. Laboratory gas exchange measurements of assimilation rates (13.15-13.25 micromoles CO2 m-2 sec-1), stomatal conductances (31.53-38.44 centimoles H2O m-2 sec-1), water use efficiencies (8.10-9.66 mg CO2 g H2O-1) and stomatal response to low leaf water potentials (i.e. initiation of stomatal closure at -16 to -20 bars) were also similar for the two species. Differences in their maximum functional leaf areas (421 cm2 vs 209 cm2 for S. canadensis and S. juncea, respectively, at maturity), phenologies (S. juncea flowers about one month earlier than S. canadensis) and the presence of the non-reproductive rosette habit in the dry site species (S. juncea) are probably more important in explaining the differential distributions of these two species than differences in their water use patterns.
Related Concept Videos
Adaptations that Reduce Water Loss
Responses to Drought and Flooding
Responses to Salt Stress
Xylem and Transpiration-driven Transport of Resources
Regulation of Transpiration by Stomata
Regulation of Water Output

