Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Correlation and Causation01:27

Correlation and Causation

43.6K
Statistical tests can calculate whether there is a relationship, or correlation, between independent and dependent variables. An indirect relationship of the variables signifies a correlation, while a direct relationship shows causation. If it is determined that no connection exists between the variables, then the correlation is a coincidence.
Correlation versus Causation
If the dependent variable increases or decreases when the independent variable increases, there is a positive or negative...
43.6K
Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

12.6K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
12.6K
Correlations02:20

Correlations

36.8K
Correlation means that there is a relationship between two or more variables (such as ice cream consumption and crime), but this relationship does not necessarily imply cause and effect. When two variables are correlated, it simply means that as one variable changes, so does the other. We can measure correlation by calculating a statistic known as a correlation coefficient. A correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to +1 that indicates the strength and direction of the relationship between...
36.8K
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

914
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
914
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

1.5K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.5K
Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

1.8K
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
1.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A comprehensive framework for integrating lake hypsography and function on a global scale.

Nature water·2025
Same author

Divergent oxygen trends in ice-covered lakes driven by ice-cover decline and ecological memory.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Net greenhouse gas balance of fibre wood plantation on peat in Indonesia.

Nature·2023
Same author

Tracking the upstream history of aquatic microbes in a boreal lake yields new insights on microbial community assembly.

PNAS nexus·2023
Same author

Magnitude and Drivers of Oxic Methane Production in Small Temperate Lakes.

Environmental science & technology·2022
Same author

The role of methanotrophy in the microbial carbon metabolism of temperate lakes.

Nature communications·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 6, 2026

Author Spotlight: Bridging the Gap Between Field Observations and Lab Manipulations in Larval Ecology Research
05:53

Author Spotlight: Bridging the Gap Between Field Observations and Lab Manipulations in Larval Ecology Research

Published on: January 5, 2024

931

Some misconceptions about the spurious correlation problem in the ecological literature.

Yves T Prairie1, David F Bird1

  • 1Department of Biology, McGill University, 1205 avenue Docteur Penfield, H3A 1B1, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Oecologia
|March 18, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Correlations involving shared variables are often mistakenly dismissed as invalid. This study clarifies that such statistical relationships are legitimate and should not be excluded, addressing common ecological misconceptions.

Keywords:
RatiosRelationshipsSelf-thinningSpurious correlationStatistical inference

More Related Videos

Linking Predation Risk, Herbivore Physiological Stress and Microbial Decomposition of Plant Litter
10:20

Linking Predation Risk, Herbivore Physiological Stress and Microbial Decomposition of Plant Litter

Published on: March 12, 2013

14.0K
Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity
08:16

Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity

Published on: March 13, 2014

19.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 6, 2026

Author Spotlight: Bridging the Gap Between Field Observations and Lab Manipulations in Larval Ecology Research
05:53

Author Spotlight: Bridging the Gap Between Field Observations and Lab Manipulations in Larval Ecology Research

Published on: January 5, 2024

931
Linking Predation Risk, Herbivore Physiological Stress and Microbial Decomposition of Plant Litter
10:20

Linking Predation Risk, Herbivore Physiological Stress and Microbial Decomposition of Plant Litter

Published on: March 12, 2013

14.0K
Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity
08:16

Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity

Published on: March 13, 2014

19.5K

Area of Science:

  • Ecology
  • Statistics
  • Ecological Methodology

Background:

  • Ecologists frequently misunderstand statistical correlations involving shared variables.
  • This misconception leads to the incorrect exclusion of valid ecological hypotheses.
  • Statistical concepts regarding spurious relationships have been clarified for decades.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the misconception that correlations with shared variables are statistically invalid.
  • To guide ecologists toward correct statistical interpretation in their research.
  • To differentiate between spurious correlation and spurious inference.

Main Methods:

  • Revisiting statistical literature on correlations with shared terms.
  • Analyzing the confusion between spurious correlation and spurious inference.
  • Examining concept familiarity and definition issues, using the plant self-thinning rule as a case study.
  • Considering measurement error in shared variable components.

Main Results:

  • Correlations involving shared variables are not inherently invalid.
  • Misinterpretation stems from confusing correlation with inference and issues with concept definition.
  • Measurement error in shared components is a valid concern but does not invalidate the correlation itself.

Conclusions:

  • Ecologists should not exclude hypotheses based on correlations with shared variables.
  • Correct statistical inference requires understanding the nuances of correlation and variable relationships.
  • Further attention to statistical methodology can improve ecological research validity.